|
|
|
106
NEGATIVE.
Messrs.
Goldsborough, P't Hebb, Robinette,
Abbott, Hoffman, Russell,
Annan, Hopkins, Sands,
Audoun, Hopper, Schley,
Baker, Jones, of Cecil, Schlosser,
Barren, Keefer, Scott,
Brooks, Kennard, Smith, of Carroll,
Carter, King, Smith, of Wor.
Cunningham, Markey, Sneary,
Cushing, McComas, Stirling,
Daniel, Mullikin, Stockbridge,
Davis, of Wash., Murray, Swope,
Dellinger, Negley, Sykes,
Earle, Noble, Thomas,
Ecker, Nyman, Thruston,
Farrow, Parker, Todd,
Galloway, Pugh, Valliant,
Greene, Purnell, Wickard,
Hatch, Ridgely, Wooden—57.
So the amendment was rejected.
The said article was then adopted on its second reading.
The consideration of Article 4 was passed over informally.
Mr. King submitted the following amendment:
Article 5, 7th line, strike out all after the word "Govern-
ment. "
Which was rejected.
Mr. Scott submitted the following amendment:
Article 14, strike out all between the word "that" in the
first line, and the word "every" in the third line.
Mr. Daniel submitted the following amendment to said
amendment:
Strike out the 14th Article, and insert: That every person
in this State, or person holding property therein, ought to
contribute his proportion of public taxes for the support of
Government, according to his actual worth in real or per-
sonal property; and that fines, duties or taxes may properly
and justly be imposed or laid on persons or property for the
good government and benefit of the community.
The question being on the adoption of the said amendment
to the amendment.
|
|
|
|
 |
