clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 622   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

622

Balt. city, Davis, Kilgour, Brewer, Waters, Anderson, Smith,
Cockey and Brown—45.

So the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurred and was put,
Will the Convention accept the substitute as offered by Mr.
Bowie, and amended on the motion of Mr. Urisfield, for the 2nd
and 3rd sections of the report?
Determined in the affirmative.
The said amendment was then adopted as the 2nd article of the
report.
Mr. Kilgour, moved the Convention adjourn;
Determined in the negative.
The 4th section in the original report, but now the 3rd section,
was then read
Mr. Brent of Balt, city, offered as a substitute for said section,
the following
"There shall be a clerk of the court of Appeals elected at the
same time with the judges of the court of Appeals, by a plurali
ty vote of the qualified electors of the State, who shall hold his
office for a term of ten years, and receive a salary to be fixed by
law."
Which was read.
On motion of Mr. Spencer,
The Convention was called.
Mr. John Newcomer, moved to suspend further proceedings
under the call, and that the question be taken by yeas and nays.
Mr. Thawley, moved the Convention adjourn;
Mr. Michael Newcomer, mowed the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Hopewell, Donaldson, Dorsey, Randall,
Selirnan, James U. Dennis, Williams, Miller, Sprigg, McCubbin,
George, Wright, McMaster, Fooks, Jacobs, rrhawley, Brewer,
Waters, Fitzpatrick and Smith—20.
NEGATIVE—-Messrs. Chapman, Prest., Blakistone, Dent,
Ricaud, Lee, Wells, Brent, of Charles, Jenifer, Buchanan,
Lloyd, Dickinson, Orisfield, Dash iell, Hicks, Goldsborough,
Eccleston, Bowie, Tuck, spencer, Dirickson, Thomas, Gaither,
Biser, Sappington, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Gwinn, Stewart,
of Balt. city, Ware, Schley, Fiery, John Newcomer, Harbine,
Michael Newcomer, Davis, Kilgour, Anderson, Weber, Slicer,
Parke, Shower, Cockey and Brown—43.
So the Convention refused to adjourn.
The question then recurred and was put on the motion of Mr.
John Newcomer, to suspend further proceedings under the call, and
Determined in the affirmative.
Mr. Thawley, moved the Convention adjourn.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 622   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives