clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 589   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

589

So the amendment was adopted.

The said 10th section was then adopted as amended.

On motion of Mr. Thomas,
The Convention then resumed the consideration of the 9th sec
tion of the report;

The question svas then put on the substitute as offered by Mr.
Bowie, for said 9th section of said report and amendment offered
by Mr. Crisfield;
Mr. Bowie, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Morgan, Hopewell, Ricauci, Mitchell,
Weems, Buchanan, Welch, Chandler, Ridgely, McCullough,
Miller, McLane, Bowie, Tuck, Shriver, Johnson, Biser, Michael
Newcomer, Hollyday, Fitzpatrick and S mith—2 1.
NEGATIVE—-Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Lee, Chambers, of Kent,
Donaldson, Wells, Randall, Kent, Sellman, Dalrymple, Brent of
Charles, Merrick, Howard, Bell, Sherwood of Talbot, Coiston,
John Dennis, C risfield, Dashiell, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough,
Eccieston, Phelps, Sprigg, Spencer, Grason, George, Wright,
Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, rphorns Gaither,
Annan, Sappington, Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson,
Thawley, Stewart of Caroline, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Brent, of
Balt, city, Sherwood, of Balt, city, Ware, Schley, Fiery, Neill,
John Newcomer, Harbine, Davis, Kilgour, Brewer, Waters,
Anderson, Weber, Slicer, Parke, Ege, Shower and Brown—64,
So the Convention refused to accept the substitute.
The question then recurred upon the adoption of the amendment
as offered by Mr. Crisfield;
Mr. Crisfield, with the consent of the Convention, so modified
his amendment as to insert the word "circuit" in the place of the
word "district," wherever it occurs, and also by striking out all that
part of said amendment which relates to the judges of the Orphans'
courts of the several counties.
Mr. Thomas, moved to amend the 9th section of said report by
striking out in the 17th line thereof the word "two," and inserting
in lieu thereof the word "four;"
Mr. Thomas, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays
and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Donaldson, Wells, Randall, Kent,
Buchanan, McLane, Thomas, Shriver, Johnson, Gaither, Biser,
Annan, Stewart of Caroline, Sherwood of Balt, city, Ware,
Schley, Fiery, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer,
Weber, Hollyday, Smith, Ege and Showcr—25.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Hopewell,
Ricaud, Lee, Chambers of Kent, Mitchell, Seilman, Weems,
Dalrymple, Brent of Charles, Howard, Bell, Welch, Chandler,
Ridgley, Sherwood of Talbot, Colston, John Dennis, Crisfield,
Dashiell, Hicks, Hudson, Goldsborough, Eccleston, Phelps,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 589   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives