clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 590   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


590



McCullough, Miller, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, Spencer, Grason,
TVright, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Sappington,
Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Thawley, Hardcastle,
Gwinn, Brent of Balt. city, Davis, Kilgour, Brewer, Waters,
Anderson, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Parke and Brown—57.
So the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurred upon the amendment as offered by
Mr. Crisfield, to said 9th section
Mr. Spencer, moved to postpone the consideration of said
section;
Determined in the negative.
Mr. Spencer, then offered as a substitute for said amendment
and section, the amendment proposed by him on yesterday, and
to be found on page 625 of Journal.
Mr. McMaster, moved to amend the 9th section of the report of
the committee, by striking out in the 15th line "two thousand,"
and inserting in lieu thereof "fifteen hundred;"
Mr. McMaster, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays
and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Lee, Mitchell, Selirnan, Bell, Sher
wood of Talbot, John Dennis, Dashiell, Spencer, Dirickson,
McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Thomas, Shriver, Gaither,
Biser, Annan, Thaw ley, Hardcastle, Schley, Fiery, John New
comer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Anderson, Weber, Slicer,
Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke Ege, Shower and Brown—35.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Hopewell,
Ricaud, Donaldson, Wells, Randall, Kent, Weems, Dalrymple,
Sollers, Brent of Charles, Jenifer, Howard, Buchanan, Welch,
Chandler, Ridgely, Colston, Hicks, Hocison, Goldsborough,
Eccleston, Phelps, McCullough, Miller, McLane, Bowie, Tuck,
Sprigg, Grason, George, Wright, Johnson, Sappington, Stephenson,
McHenry, Nelson, Gwinn, Brent, of Baltimore city, Ware, Davis,
Kilgour, Brewer, Waters and Hollyday—46.
So the amendment was rejected.
Mr. Miller, moved to amend said 9th section of the report by
striking out in the 7th line the word "ten," and inserting in lieu
thereof "six;"
Mr. Bowie, moved for a division of the question,which was put
on striking out;
Mr. Fitzpatrick, moved the qtiestionbe taken by yeas and nays
and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Miller, McLane, D irickson, Thomas, Shri
ver, Johnson, Gaither, Biser, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Brent, of
Balt. city, Sherwood of Balt. city, Ware, John Newcomer,
Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Slicer,
Fitzpatrick, Parke, Ege, Shower and Brown—26.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, President, Morgan, Hopewell,


  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 590   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives