326

Master, Fooks, Jacobs, Sappington, Nelson, Carter, Fiery, John
Newcomer, K i lgour and Wat ers—3 1.

NEGATIVE----Messrs. Donaldson, Sollers, Merrick, Jenifer, B uchan
art, Bell, W elch, Chandler, Ridgely, Lloyd, Dickinson, Sher
wood, of Talbot, Colston, Constable, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller,
McLane, Tuck, George, Wright, Thomas, Shriver, Gaither,
Biser, Annan, McHenry, Magraw, Thawley, Stewart of Caroline,
Gwinn, Stewart of Balt. city, Sherwood of Balt. city, Presstman,
Ware, Neill, Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Weber,
Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Shower and Brown—44.

So the 4th and last branch of said order was rejected.
Mr. Merrick, moved that the Convention reconsider their vote
adopting the 1st branch of said order;

Mr. Merrick, withdrew the motion to reconsider;

Mr. Thomas, renewed the motion to reconsider

Mr. Morgan, moved to lay the motion to reconsider on the
table; and

Moved for the yeas and nays, and being ordered appeared as
follows:

AFFIRMATIVE. —Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Wells,
Kent, Weems, Bond, Sollers, Jenifer, John Dennis, James U.
Dennis, Cisfield, Dashiell, Williams, Hodson, Phelps, Tuck,
McCubbin, M cMast er, Fooks, Jacobs, Sappington, Stephenson,
Nelson, Thawley, Ki lgour and Waters—32.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Donaldson, Buchanan, Bell, Welsh,
Chadler, Ridgely, Lloyd, Dickinson, Sherwood, of Talbot,
Colston, Constable, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, McLane,
George, Wright, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Annan, Magraw,
Stewart, of Caroline, Gwinn, Stewart, of Baltimore city
Brent, of Baltimore city, Sherwood, of Baltimore city, Presst
man, Ware, Fiety, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael
Newcomer, Brewer, Weber, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Shower
and Brown —40.

So the Convention refused to lay the motion to reconsider on
the table.

The question then recurred upon the motion of Mr. Thomas,
to reconsider the vote of the Convention adopting the 1st branch
of the order;
Mr. Spencer, moved the previous question,

And being seconded, the question was put on the motion of
Mr. Thomas, to reconsider the vote of the Convention on the 1st
branch of the order, and
Determined in the negative.

Mr. Presstrnan, then moved that the Convention consent to re