22

LAWS OF MARYLAND.

CHAPTER 23.
AN ACT to repeal Chapter four hundred and seven, of the
Acts of the General Assembly of Maryland of eighteen hun-
dred and ninety-eight, entitled an "Act to add an addi-
tional section to Article 38 of the Code of Public General
Laws, entitled 'Fines and Forfeitures,' " to follow Section
three, to be known as Section four.

Repeal Act
entitled Fines
and Forfeit-
ures.

SECTION I . Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Mary-
land, That Chapter four hundred and seven, of the General
Assembly of Maryland of eighteen hundred and ninety-eight,
entitled an "Act to add an additional section to Article 38
of the Code of Public General Laws, entitled 'Fines and
Forfeitures,' " to follow Section three, and to be known as Sec-
tion four, be and the same is hereby repealed ; provided that
the provisions of this Act shall not apply to Washington,

Counties ex-
empted.

Allegany, Garrett, Harford, Charles, Calvert, Kent, Balti-
more, St. Mary's, Dorchester, Prince George's, Carroll,
Somerset, Wicomico, Frederick, Talbot, Worcester and
Howard Counties.

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That this Act shall take
effect from the date of its passage.

Approved March i, 1900,

CHAPTER 24.
AN ACT to authorize and direct the Comptroller of the State
Treasury and the Comptroller of Baltimore City, respec-
tively, to refund to Philip Lobe and Henry Rosenheim &
Sons money erroneously paid into the treasuries, respec-
tively, of said State and municipality.

Refund sum of
money to
Philip Lobe
and Henry Ro-
secheim & Sons

WHEREAS, In the year 1890 the Liquor License Commis-
sioners of Baltimore City received from Philip Lobe the sum
of five hundred dollars for liquor licenses, and in years 1890,
1891 and 1892 received from Henry Rosenheim & Sons the
sum of fifteen hundred dollars for similar licenses under a
misconstruction of the law; and

Amount due
by said parties

WHEREAS, The amount due by said parties was only one-
half of the amounts so paid by them as was decided by the
Court of Appeals of Maryland in the case of the State of
Maryland vs. Steifel, the said decision being reported in the
Maryland Reports, Vol. 74; and