Volume 96, Page 551 View pdf image (33K) |
1900.]OF THE SENATE. 551 AFFIRMATIVE—None. NEGATIVE. Messrs. President, Gray, Applegarth, Kirwan, Baker, Marsh, Beasman, Messick, Betts, Moses, Bouic, Peter, Brewington, Putzel, Bryan, Ravenscroft, Crothers, Wilkinson, - Dennis, Williams, of Har., Dodson, Williams, of A. A., —22. FURTHER AMENDMENT PROPOSED. By Mr. Putzel, Amend section 7 by striking out lines 21 to 28, inclu- sive, and inserting instead thereof the following: "Kind not contrary to law, with any individual firm, associa- tion or corporation for the production of any enterprise or for the management or construct-ion of any building or buildings or any work or works which tend or be de- signed to improve, increase." Which proposed amendment was adopted. FURTHER AMENDMENT PROPOSED. Amend line 34 of section 7, by striking out the word "franchises." Which proposed amendment was adopted. FURTHER AMENDMENT PROPOSED, After section 8, add an additional section, to he known as ‘Section 9," and to read as follows: "Section 9. And be it further enacted, That the Gen- eral Assembly of Maryland reserves the right to repeal, alter, change or amend this Act at its pleasure." Which proposed amendment was adopted, and the bill Was read the second time, and ordered to be en- grossed for a third reading. Mr. Moore, from Committee on Corporations, reported favorably, Senate bill No. 175, entitled "An Act to amend the |
||||
Volume 96, Page 551 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.