6oo MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

Garret Sennotts Cer: 150 in Cha: Co^ty Acres Called S^t Peters Dated i i^th
Dec^r 1663 the patient thereon Granted said Sennott the 24^th May 1664. Is
Marginted as above in Lib: A A fo: 528. Test J Lawson Reg^r

John Wards Certif: 150 Acres in Cha: Co^ty Called Pomphrett Dated
Sep^r 2Q^th 1666 the patent thereon Granted said Ward the 7^th March 1667.
Is Marginted as above in Lib G G fol: 233. Test J Lawson Reg^r

And Now here this Day To Witt on the Second Tuesday of Aprill being
the Eleventh Day of the same month Anno Dom: Seventeen Hundred and
Twenty Seven Comes the said Thomas Nelson lessee of the said John Diggs
into his Lordships High Court of Appeals and Errors by Edmond Jnnings
[sic] his Attorney and Saith that in the Record an Process aforesaid As also in
Rendering the judgment afores^t it is Manifestly Erred in this Viz^t: That by
the Record aforesaid it Appears that the judgment rendered was rendered
for the Said Jn^o Beale against [796] The said John Diggs his Lessee aforesaid
Whereas by the Law of the Land the Judgment afores^d Ought to have been
Rendered for the Lessee of the said John Diggs against the said John Beale
and not for the said John Beale against the Lessee aforesaid. And the said
Edmond Jennings Prays his Lordships Writt to forewarn the said John Beale
to be before his Lordships Governour and Council at Annapolis to hear the
Record and Processs afores^d And it is Granted unto him Therefore Command
is given to the sherriff of Charles County that he Should Make known to the
said John Beale that He Should be and Appeare in the said High Court of
Appeals to be held at the City of Annapolis the Second tuesday of July then
Next to hear the Errors Assigned Upon the judgment afores^t if to him it
should Seem Meet And the same Day is Given to the Lessee of the said Jn^o
Diggs Also. At Which said Second Tuesday of July Anno Dom: Seventeen
Hundred and twenty Seven Before his Lordships High Court or Appeals
afores^d at the City of Annapolis Afores^d Come as well the Said Thomas Nel-
son lessee of the said John Diggs by his attorney afores^t As the afs^d John
Beale by William Beckinghame his Attorney And the sherriff afores^t Did not
Send the Writt And thereupon the said Thomas Nelson lessee afores^t as be-
fore sayth That in the Record and Process afores^d as also in rendering the
judgment afores^d It is Manifestly Erred Alledging the Errors Afores^t by him
the said Thomas Nelson in form afores^t above alledged And Prays that the
judgment afores^t for the Errors and others in the Record and Process afores^d
Being May be reversed Annulled And Altogether held for None and that he
to all things Which by Occasion of the judgment afores^t hath lost may be
Restored And that the said John Beale to the Errors afores^t Rejoyne And
that his said Lordships Court of Appeals and Errors here Will Proceed to
the Examination of As well the Record and Process afores^t as of the Matters
afores^t Above for Errors assigned And the said John Beale sayth that Neither
in the record and Process afores^t Nor in the Matters therein Contained: Nor
in Rendring the judgment afs^d it is in Anywise Erred And Likewise Prays