|
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 511
According to the Rule afd the Severall Motions following were made and
Ordered to be Entered Vizt On the Motion of Mr Dulany of Councill with
the Complainant praying that an Entry be made that in February Court
when the rule was made for an hearing of [704] This Cause upon Bill an-
swer and Demurrer as by Consent of Both parties he was not in Court nor
Consenting to that rule but was then rendered incapable of practiseing by
an Act of Assembly made Last October Untill he Should have Taken An
Oath perscribed by that Act Which Oath he the Sd Dulany Taken he De-
clares that he believes it Would have Involved him in the Guilt of Perjury.
Edmond Jennings also of Councill for the Said Forward Was not in
Court at the Sd Motion nor Consenting to the Sd Rule being rendered also
Incapable to practise at That time
The Defendant Conceives that the aforegoing Rules tend to the Charge-
ing him with taking Some Advantage Agt the Complt on the Rule for hearing
one Bill and answer and for Want of their Assistance at That time offers
himself ready to prove any fact that is alledged In his answer that Shall be
Denyed by them in the Course of the Arguments on this hearing if Such facts
be Materiall in the Cause So as the Delay of a Court or Term be not Occa-
sioned thereby and also to Allow of any Records to be produced in the Case
Thereupon the Sd Cause Comeing to be heard and Argued as aft before
his Honour Charles Calvert Esqr Chancellor and keeper of the great Seale in
the presence of the Complainants Councill and of the Defendant in proper
person the Complainants Bill and the Defendants answer and Demurrer
thereto and the Whole proceedings thereon were Read and Appeared to be
as before Set forth
Whereupon and upon a full hearing of the Bill Answer and Demurrer
afd and of the allegations and Arguments of both parties and upon Mature
Consideration Thereupon had by his Honour the Judge here It's Ordered
Adjudged and Decreed that the Complainants St Bill be Dismist and that
the Complainant pay unto the Sd Defendt all his Costs and Charges by him
in the Sd Cause Laid out and Expended
Whereupon Mr Patrick Sympson Agent to the Sd Complainant present
here in Court at the giveing the Sd Decree on behalf of the Said Complainant
appealed from the Sd Decree to the Governour and Councill in Chancery.
And Thereupon the Said Appeale is Accordingly granted upon giveing good
Security in One hundred pounds Sterling for the prosecution of the Said
Appeale.
Copia Vera
Per Rd Clagett Regr
And Thereupon Afterwds To witt on the Same Nineteenth Day of May
Seventeen hundred and Twenty Six in the Same Court of Appeals here the
Said Jonathan Forward appeared by Michael Macnemara his Council and
the Said Thomas Bordley Likewise appeared in his proper person There-
|