| Volume 60, Page 131 View pdf image (33K) |
Charles County Court Proceedings, 1666—1668. 131
Philip Bisse Plaintife versus Daniel Johnson Defendt in a Plea Liber C
of trespasse upon the case; Damrnages to the value of [blank] Writt
of Capias to the Sherrife retornable ut Supra
By virtue of this writt I have taken Daniel Johnson within Sherrifes
written whose Bodie at the Day and Place I have readie as the retorne
writt me requireth. Jonath. Marler Dep Sherrife
Thomas Baker Plaintife versus Humphrey Warren as Attorney
of Philip Bisse in a Plea of trespasse upon the case; Dammages to
the value of [blank] Writt of Capias to the Sherrife Retornable Ut
Supra
By virtue of this writt I have taken Mr Humphry Warren At- Sherrifes
torney of Philip Bisse whose bodie I have readie at the Day and retorne
place as the writt requireth Jonath. Marler Dep Sherrife
Mr Joseph Harrison Complainant versus Clement Theobalds and
Marie his wife Defendts in a Case of equitie Dammages to the value
of [blank] Writt of Subpaena in Chancerie to the Sherrife and
Subpaena to Alexander Sympson & Izabella Dickenson to give
evidence, Retornable on the 9th of June 1668.
Daniel Johnson Plaintife versus Thomas Baker Defendt in a
Plea of Trespasse upon the Case; Damages to the value of [blank]
Writt of Capias to the Sherrife retornable ut Supra.
Executed Jonath. Marler Dep Sherrife Sherrifes
retorne
At a Court held in Charles Countie on the Ninth Day of June [p.268]
Anno Dni 1668.
Mr Henrie Adams Mr Zachariah Wade
Justices
Mr Francis Pope Mr Joseph Harrison
Present
Mr James Lyndsey
Charles Hey Servant of Mr Benjamin Rozer was adjudged by the
Court to be Sixteen yeares of age.
Nathaniel Barton presented a Servt by the Name of Thomas
Tiblee to have his age adjudged by the Court who was adjudged to
be Twentie yeares of age
Mr Francis Pope in the behalfe of Robert Hunley Presented a
Servant by the name of Gregorie Sudberie to have his age adjudged
and the Court adjudged him to be Sixteen yeares of age.
Mr Humphrey Warren Attorney Daniel Johnson Defendt
of Philip Bisse Plaintife
The Plaintife and Defendt made their appearance the Plaintife
by Attorney the Defendt personallie and the Plaintifes Attorney not
being able to Produce the Plaintifes Account in Court whereon the
Action was grounded It was ordered tht the Plaintife should be
Nonsuited
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 60, Page 131 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.