Volume 57, Page 458 View pdf image (33K) |
458 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1669. Liber jj Diligent enquiry hath bin by me made within my Bailiwick, whether any person to the said deceased related or Otherwise can shew law- full cause why the Grant or Pattent should not be vacated by which the within mentioned land is held, and not any person found by me Nath: Stiles Sheriff. The like Proclamacon made here at this day before his Lopps Jus- tices then present in Court, and none appeared &c. Upon the prayer of Francis Stockett for the escheate aswell of a parcell of hand called Hermans Mount containeing three hundred and fifty acres lyeing on the northside of Sassafrax River in the County of Baltemore as also one other parcell of land called Spryes Hills containeing six hundred Acres lyeing in Sassafrax River aforesaid Att a Provincial Court held at st Maries the fiftenth day of December last past before his Lopps Justices there, which said Justices then Ordered That notice should be given to the respective Sheriffs of Ann Arrundell and Baltemore Countyes to enquire within their re- spective Bailiwicks whether any person unto John Hatton late de- ceased in whose possession the same lands late were, related or other- wise cou!d shew any lawfull cause why the Grants or Pattents for the same should not be vacated, and that they make returne of their proceedings therein to his Lopps Justices here at this day, Who make returne thereof as follow In Ann Arrundell County, April the MDClxix Nullus inventus ? me Tho: Stockett Sher. Diligent enquiry hath bin made by me within my Bailiwick whether any person to the said deceased related or Otherwise can shew law- full cause why the grants or Pattents should not be vacated by which the within mentioned land is held, and not any person is found by mee Nath: Stiles Sheriff. [p. 11] Richard Ti!ghman produced his accompt against Thomas Hinson and John Hynson administrators of Thomas Hynson Sen late de- ceased for foure thousand six hundred sixty one pounds of tobacco and the same proved upon his Oath in Open Court. And the said Thomas and John by Daniel Jenifer their Attorny came and defended the force and injury when &c And the same At- torny then said that he was not informed by the same Thomas and John his Clients of any answer for the said Thomas and John in that case to be then given and then said nothing else thereunto whereby the said Richard then remained against the said Thomas and John thereof without defence Therefore it was then considered by the Court here that the said Richard Tilghman should recover against the said Thomas and John the debt aforesaid. |
||||
Volume 57, Page 458 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.