clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1658-1662
Volume 41, Page 299   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Provincial Court Proceedings, 1659. 299


susteyned for the want of his sd plantaon, & other Costs then al-
leged & claymed by him.

Li'oer
P. C. R.

And whereas att a Prouinciall Court held for this Prouince in
Caluert County on the 8th day of Octobr last the sd Thomas Sowth
Petitioned for a rehearing, touching the Costs & dammages only :
for tht the Commisrs of the County of Kent aforesd intermedled wth a
Cause not wth in their Cognizance, wch was then graunted (as by the
sd Order & Petn 8o Octobr may more fully appeare) And whereas

Vid. fol. 125

likewise att the Prouinciall Court held att St Maries the 3d of March
last a Easpeciall writt or Commisrs was directed to Coll Nathaniel Vtie
& Edward Lloyd Esqr, Joseph Wicks & Capt Robt Vaughan gentn.
The wittnesses touching the foresd Dammages & Costs dilligently to
examine & the Examinaons into this Prouinciall Court, distinctly &
clearely to send, Together wth their Opinions, what uppon the prem-
ises is fitt to bee done, (as by the sd Order & Writt may allso ap-
peare) make returne thereof as followeth (Viz)

To the honble the Gour & Councell

Whereas a Commisn (bearing date the 3d of March 1658) was
directed to Vs from yor honours to heare matters of difference
betweene John Salter plf & Thomas Sowth & Thomas Hinson defts,
& hauing dilligently examined the premises doe humbly make Our
Report as followeth, ffirst as Touching the damages alleaged by the
sd John Salter agst the aforesd Thomas Sowth. Wee apprehend the
sd Sowth is not lyable to satisfy any damages uppon former accounts ;
by reason the sd Sowth held his posses" by Order of Law, Wch sd
Order wee haue hereunto annexed.
Concerning the Charge of building & clearing alleaged by the
defendts, We thinke it may bee ballanced by damage clone unto the
Plantaon.
As for all other differences (brought before us) depending be-
tweene the sd parties or eyther of them, They did willingly com-
pose betwixt themselues
Aprill 4th 1659 Sealed & Signed by
Nath: Vtie Sealed by
Edw: Lloyd all Three
Robt Vaughan Seuerally.

I agree & consent to the Report & Opinion rendered aforesd If yor
honrs shall Judge the foresd proceedings, wch they call Order of Law
to bee legally graunted according to formality in Law. The Order
being not graunted by sworne Judges. And the Grownds of the sd
Order as is expressed to bee only possesn wch the sd Salter was pos-
sessed wth all att tht time Josh Wickes
Se X ale.

Vid. fol. 214



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1658-1662
Volume 41, Page 299   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives