|
|
28. |
BARNES
v. STATE, No. 120, October Term, 1945, Court of Appeals
of Maryland, 186 Md. 287; 47 A.2d 50; 1946 Md. LEXIS 203, April
11, 1946, Decided
CORE TERMS: compact, river, water, shore, fishing, admiralty,
doubtful, offenses committed, vessel, steamboat...
... Rape -- Steamboat Running on Potomac River -- Jurisdiction
-- Venue -- Compact of ...
... Maryland and Virginia agreed that the Potomac River up to
low-water ...
... criminal offenses on the waters of the Potomac River, other
than offenses under the ...
... a steamboat running on the Potomac River, and passing through
such county, ...
... a steamboat running on the Potomac River, from Norfolk to
Washington, and passing ...
... kind with which he is charged, occurring on the Potomac River,
if against a citizen of the ...
... both states claimed the Potomac River, and both also claimed
a ...
... jurisdiction over the waters of the Potomac River, the Pocomoke
River, and certain ...
... Lord Baltimore included the Potomac River to high water
mark on the ...
... interpretation of the Virginia grants was that the Potomac River
should be divided between the states ...
... not until 1877, therefore, that the Potomac River boundary
between the two ...
... merchant vessels navigating the Potomac River shall enter
and clear at ...
... property in the shores of the Potomac River adjoining their
lands and the privilege of ...
... mark on the southern shore of the Potomac River, with a
straight line ...
... by Virginia over the Potomac River, as provided in the tenth
...
... relating to fishing in the Potomac River, but not as to
any other ...
... before him was whether the Compact applied to the Potomac River
above tidewater. He determined that it did ...
... Maryland could have any operation in the Potomac River,
affecting the fishing therein, unless such ...
... citizens in the waters of the Potomac River and of Pocomoke
Sound and the Pocomoke ...
... opposite was the case with respect to the Potomac River.
This is a construction different from that ...
... Maryland, alleged to have been committed on the Potomac River
of that County. The main question ...
... ground of continuous exercise. The Potomac River belonged
to Maryland by the ...
... several counties lying on the Potomac River exercised a
common ...
... concurrent jurisdiction. The court then said "And the Potomac
River being part of the state, and ...
... over offenses committed on the Potomac River, if any such
recognition be needed."In ...
... courts of Maryland over the Potomac River, it noted that
question, and said that if the objection to the ...
... mark on the Virginia side of the Potomac River opposite
the District of Columbia. ...
... jurisdiction over the parts of the Potomac River shore which
belonged to Virginia. The ...
... time to time. See "Potomac River Statutes," Virginia Code
of ...
... cases which might occur on the Potomac River, was repealed.
In the same ...
... claimed jurisdiction over the Potomac River because it was
still claimed to be within the ...
... fishing acts, committed on the Potomac River.The Maryland
situation is entirely ...
... limits of the state across the Potomac River, which would
be to low water mark on the ...
... 25, refers only to the Potomac River, which was within county
limits. ...
... jurisdiction over offenses on the Potomac River ceased by
operation of ...
... Courts have no such authority, then the Potomac River becomes
a highway ... |
|