Volume 861, Page 3 View pdf image |
August Court
1740
3
William Whittington of a plea of trespass upon the Case &a And the same day is given to the aforesaid William Whittington here &c Att which day here Came the aforesaid William Whittington by Francis Allen his attorney and the sheriffe returned that he had taken the aforesaid William Colbart whose body here at this day he had ready to answer the aforesaid William Whittington of the aforesaid plea as to him it was Commanded And hereupon the said William Whittington Complained against the aforesaid William Colbart of the af.d plea in form following Somerset County ss William Colbart late of Somerset County planter was attached to answer unto William Whittington of a plea of trespass upon the Case &a And Whereupon the said William Whittington by Francis Allen his Attorney Complains that whereas the said William Colbert after the first of may Anno Dom Seventeen hundred and five to witt on the first day of April Seventeen hundred and forty at the County of Somerset aforesaid within the Jur of this Court made his Certain note in Writing Called a promissory note with his proper hand Subscribed bearing date the same day and year last mentioned and the said note to the said William Whittington then and there delivered by which said note the sid William Colbert did promise to pay to the said William Whittington or his order the sum of four pounds three Shillings Current money of Maryland and by reason thereof as also by force of the statute in that Case lately made and provided the said William Colbert became Chargeable to pay to the said William Whittington the af.d Sum of Money According to the tenor of the said note and so being Chargeable the aforesaid William Colbert in Consideration thereof afterwards to witt the aforesaid first day of April Seventeen hundred and forty aforesaid at Somerset County aforesaid upon himself did assume and to the said William Whittington then and there did faithfully promise to pay him the aforesaid Sum of money According to the tenor of the said note yett the said William Colbert his promise and assumption aforesaid in Forme aforesaid made nothing regarding but plotting and fraudulently Intending the said William Whittington in that parte Craftilly and Subtilly to deceive and defraud tho often thereunto requested the said sum of money to the said William Whittigton according to the tenor of the said note hath not paid or Contented but the same to him hitherto to pay hath refused and still doth refuse and deny to the damage of the said William Whittington of Eight pounds Six shillings Current money of Maryland aforesaid and thereupon he brings Suit & Pledg.s & John Doe R Roe And the aforesaid William Colbert in his proper person Comes and defends the force and Injury when &.a and saith that he Cannot deny the Action aforesaid of the aforesaid William Whittington nor but that he did assume upon himself in manner and form as the aforesaid William Whittington above against him hath Complained and as to the damage of the same William Whittington by him by occasion of the premisses in that part sustained the same William Colbert saith and acknowledged that the aforesaid William Whittington hath sustained damages by occasion of the premisses beyond his Costs and Charges by him about his Suit in that part apposed to four pounds three shillings Current money of Maryland and not more and because the aforesaid William Whittington denyes not this but the same Allegation Granted to be true prays Judgment for those damages above acknowledged together with his Costs and Charges aforesaid to him to be adjudged & Therefore by Consent of the parties af.d it is Considered that the af.d William Whittington recover against the af.d William |
||||
Volume 861, Page 3 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.