Volume 801, Page 2740 View pdf image |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
S.B. 269 VETOES (III) THE PERSON CONTESTING REGISTRATION WAS ENTITLED TO (E) IF A TIMELY REQUEST FOR A HEARING TO CONTEST THE VALIDITY OF THE (F) CONFIRMATION OF A REGISTERED ORDER, WHETHER BY OPERATION OF 9.5-306. (A) A COURT OF THIS STATE MAY GRANT ANY RELIEF NORMALLY AVAILABLE (B) A COURT OF THIS STATE SHALL RECOGNIZE AND ENFORCE, BUT MAY NOT 9.5-307. (A) IF A PROCEEDING FOR ENFORCEMENT UNDER THIS SUBTITLE IS (B) THE PROCEEDING FOR ENFORCEMENT CONTINUES UNLESS THE 9.5-308. (A) (1) A PETITION UNDER THIS SUBTITLE SHALL BE VERIFIED. (2) CERTIFIED COPIES OF ALL ORDERS SOUGHT TO BE ENFORCED AND (3) A COPY OF A CERTIFIED COPY OF AN ORDER MAY BE ATTACHED (B) A PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF A CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION - 2740 -
|
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 801, Page 2740 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.