clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 4958   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
H.B. 70 VETOES
be filed and heard in the District Court. Expanding the exclusive jurisdiction for the
District Court has an impact on the ability of a litigant to request a trial by jury, and
precludes discovery in cases that may involve relatively minor amounts in potential
damages, but have a real impact in the life of citizens. The established jurisdictional amounts for our court system are designed to carefully
balance the cases considered by the District Court and circuit courts in order to
protect the rights of the individuals involved in legal actions. The disruption of this
balance created by increasing the established jurisdictional amount in controversy
may unfairly prejudice plaintiffs by limiting their rights. I agree with the Maryland
State Bar Association's stated reluctance to change jurisdictional amounts unless
supported by substantial evidence that such a change is warranted. House Bill 70
does not provide the compelling evidence necessary to alter the current law. This
concern prompted the Maryland Trial Lawyers' Association to request a veto of this
bill last year. For the above reasons, I have vetoed House Bill 70.
Sincerely, Parris N. Glendening
Governor House Bill No. 70 AN ACT concerning District Court - Small Claim Actions FOR the purpose of altering the minimum amount in controversy in civil cases over
which the District Court of Maryland and the circuit courts have concurrent
jurisdiction; altering the amount of a small claim action in the District Court;
altering the amount in controversy in a civil action in the District Court in
which formal pleadings are prohibited; altering the minimum amount in
controversy in civil cases in which appeals from the District Court are required
to be heard on the record; providing for the application of this Act; and generally
relating to small claim actions in the District Court. BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments,
Article - Courts and Judicial Proceedings
Section 4-402(d)(l)(i), 4-405, 6-403, and 12-401(f)
Annotated Code of Maryland (1998 Replacement Volume and 2001 Supplement) SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:
Article - Courts and Judicial Proceedings
- 4958 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 4958   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives