clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 4957   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor
H.B. 70
Article - Natural Resources 10-607. (a) (1) [This] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS
SUBSECTION, THIS section shall apply only to owners of riparian property in
Maryland regardless of the residency of the owner. (2) Persons Under this subtitle, persons owning riparian property in: (I) MARYLAND OR Virginia [or West Virginia] that is adjacent to
the TIDAL WATERS OF THE Potomac River may [not] license their STATE shoreline
under this subtitle; AND (II) MARYLAND, VIRGINIA, OR WEST VIRGINIA THAT IS ADJACENT
TO THE NONTIDAL WATERS OF THE POTOMAC RIVER: 1. MAY LICENSE STATE ISLAND SHORELINE; AND 2. MAY NOT LICENSE STATE MAINLAND SHORELINE. (b) Riparian landowners may license their riparian shoreline: (1) To establish offshore stationary blinds or blind sites for hunting wild
waterfowl; and (2) To prevent other persons from licensing the riparian shoreline for the
purpose of hunting wild waterfowl offshore. SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect
June 1, 2002.
May 15, 2002 The Honorable Casper R. Taylor, Jr.
Speaker of the House
State House
Annapolis MD 21401 Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with Article II, Section 17 of the Maryland Constitution, I have today
vetoed House Bill 70 - District Court - Small Claims Actions. House Bill 70 expands the exclusive original jurisdiction of the District Court and
limits the concurrent original jurisdiction of the circuit courts by increasing the
maximum amount in controversy for civil actions with the exclusive original
jurisdiction of the District Court from $2,500 to $5,000. Following the 2001 Session of the General Assembly, I vetoed identical legislation,
House Bill 546. The reasons for my veto are restated below. Currently, if a civil action involves an amount in controversy of not more than $2,500,
the District Court of Maryland has exclusive jurisdiction and the action is required to
- 4957 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 4957   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives