date of receipt, total funding for the start-up costs of the Community Court may be
expended. These start-up costs may not exceed $372,379. Remaining funds of
$962,421 for the operation of the Community Court may not be expended until
January 1, 2000.

Further provided that the fiscal 2000 general fund appropriations in the total
amount of $1,334,800 made in the following State agencies for the purpose of funding
the Community Court may not be increased by budget amendment or otherwise.
Unexpended funds at the end of fiscal 2000, appropriated for the purpose of funding
the Community Court, shall revert to the State general fund.

Agency	Program	Program	General Funds
Judiciary	CA00.04	District Court	515,700
	CA00.09	Judicial Data Processing	80,041
Public Defender	CB00.02	District Operations	111,841
DPSCS-OTS	QA01.02	Data Services	121,769
DPSCS-DPDS	QP00.02	Pretrial Release Services	100,400
	QP00.04	Central Rooking and Intake
		Facility	405,049

SECTION 35. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the general fund
appropriations made in the following State agencies may not be expended until the
Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals, in consultation with the Secretary of the
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, has jointly prepared and
submitted a plan to the budget committees which addresses the provisions outlined
under subsections (1) through (3) of this section:

Agency	Program	Program	General Funds
Judiciary	CA00.01	Court of Appeals	300,000
	CA00.04	District Court	3,000,000
	CA00.10	Clerks of the Circuit Court	5,000,000
Public Defender	CB00.02	District Operations	1,000,000
DPSCS-DPDS	QP00.01	General Administration	1,500,000
	QP00.04	Central Booking and Intake
		Facility	1,700,000
Department of State Police	WA01.07	Local Aid?Law
		Enforcement Grants	5,300,000

(1) The Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as
"Chief Judge") and the Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Correctional
Services (hereinafter referred to as "Secretary") shall fully evaluate the delay,
postponement, and dismissal problems in the Baltimore City criminal justice system.
The Chief Judge and the Secretary should seek input from the Administrative Judge
of the Eighth Judicial Circuit, the Administrative Judge of the District Court for
Baltimore City, the Mayor of Baltimore City, the State's Attorney for Baltimore City,
the Public Defender, and the Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department.

(2) The Chief Judge and the Secretary shall develop and begin to
implement a comprehensive criminal justice reform plan (hereinafter referred to
"plan") to minimize the delay, postponement, and dismissal problems in the Eighth