clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1989
Volume 771, Page 451   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor

Ch. 3

Subsection (f) of this section is new language derived
without substantive change from the first sentence of
former Art. 10, § 3(d)(1), as that sentence related to
prescribing rules to carry out the provisions of that
section.

In subsection (b) of this section, the term "good
character and reputation" is standard language
substituted for the former term "good moral
character", to conform to similar provisions elsewhere
in this article.

Also in subsection (b) of this section, the former
requirement that an applicant not be "a subversive
person as defined by the Subversive Activities Act of
1949" is deleted as obsolete since Ch. 257, Acts of
1978, repealed former Art. 85A, which was known as the
Subversive Activities Act of 1949.

In subsection (c) of this section, the requirement to
be at least 18 years old "as of the date of admission"
is added to reflect that, under § 10-209(a)(2) of this
subtitle, an individual may take the examination
before becoming 18.

In subsection (d)(1) of this section, the affirmative
duty to complete 90 hours is substituted for the
former statement, in the third sentence of former Art.
10, § 4(b), that completion is "satisfactory
compliance with the requirements of this subsection
[former § 4(b)]". The former statement was misleading
since it suggested that completion of 90 hours was
only an alternative for completion of 3 years of
college -- as stipulated in the first sentence of
former § 4(b) -- even if the 3 years encompassed fewer
than 90 hours. In fact, the 90-hour requirement
superseded the 3-year requirement, and, therefore, the
first sentence of former Art. 10, § 4(b) is deleted.

This deletion also avoids another problem caused by
the prohibition, in the first sentence of former Art.
10, § 4(b), against "begin[ning] the study of law"
unless the person submits proof satisfactory to the
Board that the person has completed the prelegal
education requirements. Under Rule 2 of the Rules
Governing Admission to the Bar, the Board requires
proof of compliance with the prelegal education
requirements as part of the Application for
Registration as a Candidate for Admission to the Bar.
That application may be submitted by any individual
already enrolled in a law school and, in practice,
usually is submitted during the last year of law
school.

- 451 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1989
Volume 771, Page 451   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives