clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1987
Volume 769, Page 897   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor                    Ch. 163

substances, or any conspiracy or solicitation to commit any of
the foregoing offenses. No application or order shall be required
if the interception is lawful under the provisions of § 10-402(c)
of this subtitle.

10-409.

(a)  Within 30 days after the expiration of THE TOTAL PERIOD
OF an order [(or], INCLUDING each extension [thereof)] entered
under § 10-408 of this subtitle, OR WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER DENIAL
OF AN APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER OR EXTENSION, the [issuing] judge
WHO PASSED THE ORDER OR DENIED THE APPLICATION shall report to
the Administrative Office of the Courts:

(1)  The fact that an order or extension was applied

for;

(2)  The kind of order or extension applied for;

(3)  The fact that the order or extension was granted
as applied for, was modified, or was denied;

(4)  The period of interceptions authorized by the
order[,] and the number and duration of any extensions of the
order;

(5)  The offense specified in the order or
application[,] or extension of an order;

(6)  The identity of the applying investigative or law
enforcement officer and agency making the application and the
person authorizing the application; and

(7)  The nature of the facilities from which or the
place where communications were to be intercepted.

(b)  In January of each [year] YEAR, the Attorney General,
THE STATE PROSECUTOR, and the State's Attorneys shall report to
the Administrative Office of the Courts:

(1)  The information required by [paragraphs (1)
through (7) of] subsection (a) of this section with respect to
each application for an order or extension made during the
preceding calendar year;

(2)  A general description of the interceptions made
under the order or extension, including (i) the approximate
nature and frequency of incriminating communications intercepted,
(ii) the approximate nature and frequency of other communications
intercepted, (iii) the approximate number of persons whose
communications were intercepted, and (iv) the approximate nature,
amount, and cost of the manpower and other resources used in the
interceptions;

- 897 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1987
Volume 769, Page 897   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives