clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1990   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
Ch. 372                                    2006 LAWS OF MARYLAND
ON A SHOWING THAT A PARTY NEEDS ACCESS TO A RECORD TO PREPARE FOR A
HEARING ON A MOTION PENDING UNDER THIS SECTION, A TRIAL JUDGE MAY ALLOW
THE PARTY TO INSPECT AND COPY A RECORD AS NEEDED TO PREPARE. (D)     EVIDENCE. A MOVANT WHO FILES A MOTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION IS
ENTITLED TO PRESENT RELEVANT EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION,
INCLUDING: (1)      THE TESTIMONY OF THE JURY COMMISSIONER; AND (2)      RELEVANT RECORDS, WHETHER OR NOT PUBLIC, THAT THE JURY
COMMISSIONER USED. (E)     DUTY OF TRIAL JUDGE - GRAND JURY. (1)      IF A TRIAL JUDGE FINDS A SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
§ 8-102(B) OF THIS TITLE IN SELECTING A GRAND JURY, THE JUDGE SHALL: (I) STAY THE CASE PENDING SELECTION OF A GRAND JURY IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS TITLE; OR (II) DISMISS THE CHARGING DOCUMENT. (2)      IF A TRIAL JUDGE FINDS A SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
A PROVISION OTHER THAN § 8-102(B) OF THIS TITLE IN SELECTING A GRAND JURY
AND FINDS THE FAILURE LIKELY TO BE PREJUDICIAL TO THE MOVANT, THE JUDGE
SHALL: (I)      STAY THE CASE PENDING SELECTION OF A GRAND JURY IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS TITLE; OR (II)     DISMISS THE CHARGING DOCUMENT. (F)     DUTY OF TRIAL JUDGE - TRIAL JURY. (1)      IF A TRIAL JUDGE FINDS A SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
§ 8-102(B) OF THIS TITLE IN SELECTING A TRIAL JURY, THE TRIAL JUDGE SHALL STAY
THE CASE PENDING SELECTION OF A TRIAL JURY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS TITLE. (2)      IF A TRIAL JUDGE FINDS A SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
A PROVISION OTHER THAN § 8-102(B) OF THIS TITLE IN SELECTING A TRIAL JURY AND
THE FAILURE IS LIKELY TO BE PREJUDICIAL TO THE MOVANT, THE TRIAL JUDGE
SHALL STAY THE PROCEEDING PENDING SELECTION OF A TRIAL JURY IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS TITLE. COMMITTEE NOTE: This section is new language derived without substantive
change from former CJ § 8-211(a), (c), and (d) and the first sentence of (e),
as they related to criminal cases. In subsections (a) and (b)(1) of this section, the word "party" is substituted
for the former references to "the defendant or State's Attorney, as the case
may be" and "a person accused of a crime [or] the State's Attorney", to - 1990 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1990   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives