clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1989   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 372
In the subsections (b)(1) and (e) of this section, references to a "trial" jury
are substituted for the former reference to a "petit" jury, in accordance with
the Council on Jury Use and Management's preference for language more
understandable to the public. In subsection (b)(1) of this section, reference to challenges after a jury is
sworn is added to conform to Md. Rule 2-512(a). Also in subsection (b)(1) of this section, the term "voir dire", which formerly
modified "examination", is deleted in accordance with the Council on Jury
Use and Management's recommendation as the term "is unnecessary and
mystifying to potential jurors, litigants and other lay people". Subsection (c) of this section is revised to state expressly that the decision
on access is the trial judge's. In subsection (d) of this section, the former references to a "clerk" are
deleted as unnecessary in light of the newly defined term "jury
commissioner". In subsection (e) of this section, reference to a "trial judge" is substituted
for the former references to a "court" as then defined, a circuit court to
avoid the inference that a majority of the judges of a circuit court must
concur. As to "including", see Art. 1, § 30 of the Code. Defined term: "Jury commissioner" § 8-101 8-409. IN CRIMINAL CASE. (A)     EXCLUSIVE PROCEDURE. THIS SECTION SETS FORTH THE EXCLUSIVE PROCEDURE BY WHICH A PARTY IN
A CRIMINAL CASE MAY CHALLENGE A JURY ON THE GROUND THAT THE JURY WAS
NOT SUMMONED OR OTHERWISE SELECTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS TITLE. (B)     MOTION. (1)      BEFORE EXAMINATION BEGINS IN A CRIMINAL CASE OR, FOR GOOD
CAUSE SHOWN, AFTER A JURY IS SWORN BUT BEFORE IT RECEIVES EVIDENCE, A
PARTY MAY MOVE TO DISMISS A CHARGING DOCUMENT OR STAY THE CASE ON THE
GROUND OF SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A PROVISION OF THIS TITLE IN
SELECTING THE GRAND OR TRIAL JURY. (2)      A MOTION UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL CONTAIN A SWORN
STATEMENT OF FACTS THAT, IF TRUE, WOULD CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS TITLE. (C)     ACCESS TO RECORD.
- 1989 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1989   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives