clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Chancery Court, Chancery Record, 1671-1712
Volume 748, Page 76   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
(76)

       On which said ninth day of February in the 43.th yeare of his Lopps Dominion &c
       the same Sheriff maketh returne vizt Executed p me W.m Coleborne before M.r
       Nicholas Rice M.r David Browne M.r George Johnson M.r John Winder John
       King Miles Gray Alexander Drapper good and lawfull men of my Bailiwick
       Which being read and heard and none appeareing to shew cause wherefore the said
       Letters Patents of the Land aforesaid ought not to be revoked and adnulled and the
       record and records thereof cancelled & made void and the same into his Lopps hands
       be seized  The judgment of the Court here this day to witt the thirtenth day of
       February in the year abovesaid is That the Chancellour make void the said
       Patents upon Record and that the same be revoked cancelled evacuated adnulled
       and for void and invalid had and esteemed and also that the inrollment of
       Record of them shall be cancelled and adnulled and for void and invalid held
       and esteemed

   
       Upon the Petition of Thomas Marsh That in the month of July 1673 he sold
       unto George Utie Gent a woman Servant named Hannah Bowen for which the servant
       and other goods Sold the said Utie was to pay unto the petitioner 2400. tobacco
       that in November or December 1673 the said Hannah happened to be brought to bed
       of a bastard Child and that after she was delivered by the perswasion of the
       said Utie (who had promised to her if she would lay the Child to the petitioner he
       would save her from a whipping and she should fare the better for it as by
       the affidavitt of Michael Franke and Richard Whitton it may appeare) by her affidavitt
       pend by the said Utie upon the 22.th of December 1673 to lay the said Bastard
       Child to y.e petitioner   That the petitioner haveing notice thereof did in March
       last procure a warrant for Cap.t Howell one of his Lopps justices of that County
       to have the said Hannah bound over to the next Court to be examined face to
       face with the petition.r Yet notwithstanding the pet.r attended there att the next Court
       with evidence sufficient enough to prove the Child was gott by One Edward Winwood
       by the confessions of the said Edward & Hannah & other pregnant circumstances sufficient
       to cleare the pet.r and although the Constable served the said warrant upon the said
       Hannah & gave notice to the said Utie to be there also Yet neither he nor the said
       Hannah by his Order did appeare at the said Court & so nothing was then done
       That the 3.d of June last the said Utie in the absence of the pet.r being then in Virginia
       without any notice to him or any for him brought the said Hannah to their Court
       and upon her affidavitt aforesaid and another Oath then taken in Court that the said Utie
       her master did neither advise instigate or prompt her to lay the said Bastard to the
       pet.r the Court without any other Testimony confession declaration in pangs of travell
       another pregnant circumstance agreeing thereunto as by the Act is directly provided
       in that case did ord.r at the request of one Miles Gibson the p.rtended Attorny of the
       petit.r a reference untill the next Court Att which Court being the 4.th of August last
       they Ordered the said Miles Gibson as Attorny of the petitioner to pay the said Utie
       1400. of tobacco with costs of suite for the pet.rs getting the said servant with Child
       otherwise execution      That the pet.r finding himselfe thus agreived & not heard
       petitions the Court for a reheareing the which was granted when & where the petitioner
       produced his severall evidences sufficient to cleare him as aforesaid as by the Coppyes
       thereof ready to be produced may appeare Yet the Court Ordered the former Order to
       stand with costs of suite whereupon the pet.r appealed to this Court but the said appeale
       was never entered and the said Utie hath deteined in his hands the said debt of 1400. of
       tobacco for his damages and costs as aforesaid  Now forasmuch as it plainly appeares there
       hath been a Conspiracy and contrivance betweene the said George Utie and the said Hannah Bowen
       not only to ruine the petitioner his Creditt and fortune but defraud him of his said debt of
       1400. tobacco and for that the proceedings have been very illegall and erronious the pet.r therefore
       humbly prayes to admitt his appeale and that the whole matter thereupon may be heard here
       next Court and that in the meane time an Order may issue to the Comissioners for a transcript
       of the Records of their whole proceedings therein and that the said Hannah Bowen and
       George Utie may be Ordered then and there to appeare to heare the said Appeale accordingly

                Which being read and heard it is this day to witt eighth of December in the 43.th yeare of
                his Lopps Dominion &c considered by the Court here that a Certiorari be granted
                the Petitioner the tenor whereof followeth in these words vizt


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Chancery Court, Chancery Record, 1671-1712
Volume 748, Page 76   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives