clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Chancery Court, Chancery Record, 1671-1712
Volume 748, Page 57   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
                                                1674                                                                   (57)

       to the said Indenture and Pattent which pattent ought not in Law or equity by any
       private Act or instructions but what shall be sufficient matter of record and ariseing
       before the said Certificate of Surety made for Thomas Gerard Esq and Pattent
       thereupon duly obteined be any wais accorded or sett aside  And this he is ready to
       avere and demands the judgment of this Court whether the said Letters Pattents
       for the said foure hundred acres of land called the Meadowes so as aforesaid
       made ought to be revoaked or adnulled or the said Lands seized into the hands of
       the said Lord Proprietary &c

                And the said Lord Proprietary by Vincent Lowe Esq his Lopps Attorny Gen.ll
       saith that the said Letters Pattents of him the said Lord Proprietary to him the
       said Thomas Gerard Esq in forme aforesaid granted for the said foure hundred
       acres of land called the Meadowes ought to be revoked and adnulled and the same into
       the hands of his said Lopp ought to be seized because he saith that long before the
       takeing up of the said Land by him the said Thomas Gerard the said Lord Proprietary
       the same Land had referred for his owne proper Use and did by his instructions
       to his Governour there make knowne the same who did publish and declare the
       same to his Lopps said Council and his Lopps Surveyour Gen.ll of the said
       Province which was sufficient notice of his said Lopps reserve as well to the
       said Thomas Gerard as all other the Inhabitants of his Lopps said Province
       and that the said foure hundred acres of Land called the Meadowes is
       part of his Lopps said Mannour of Choptico and within his Lopps said
       reserve  And as to the remaining part of the said plea that the said reserve
       was not entred upon record it ought not to debarre him the said Lord Proprietary
       from causeing the letters pattents aforesaid to be vacated it being the
       lackes and negligence of his Officers which ought not nor cannot prejudice
       him the said Lord Proprietary and that no prescription of time can anyway
       prevaile against him the said Lord Proprietary and this he is ready or averr
       and thereupon demands judgment and the defendant likewise

                Whereupon it was Considered by the Court that the aforesaid Letters
       pattent of his said Lordshipp the Lord proprietary shall be revoked cancelled
       evacuated adnulled and for void and invalid had and esteemed and also that the
       inrollment of Record of them shall be cancelled and adnulled and for void and
       invalid held and esteemed


Tobias Wells Complainants         the parties Complainant and def.ts ^appeareing^ this cause comeing to a heareing in the
                ag.t                             presence of the Attornyes on both sides the Complainants bill and replication
John Wright & Mary his wife      and the def.ts answer being openly read and heard and by the Court considered
adm.rx Barth Gleven def.t           of the Court was cleerely satisfied that the Quietnes in the def.ts answer
                                                  pleaded in barr against the Complainants bill of Complaint for the
                                                  summe of fourteene thousand three hundred and seaventeene pounds of
                                       tobacco due by recognizance from the said Bartholomew Glevin deceased to the Compl
                                       was not a sufficient discharge of the def.ts against the Complainant but that
                                       the same ought first and primary to have bin satisfied before debts of a
                                       lower nature and therefore upon examination of accompts by the Court here
                                       the def.t haveing produced severall bills notes and receipts in discompt of the
                                       said summe to the value of five thousand six hundred sixty one pounds of
                                       tobacco and by the Complainant allowed of the Court doe hereby Order and
                                       decree that the said John Wright ^& Mary his wife^ doe pay to the Complainant as well the
                                       summe of eight thousand six hundred sixty six pounds of tobacco the remainder
                                       of the said summe of fourteene thousand three hundred and seventeene pounds
                                       of tobacco as also the summe of six thousand pounds of tobacco for the
                                       costs and damages in this behalfe susteined which said summes in the whole
                                       doe amount unto the summe of fourteene thousand six hundred sixty six
                                       pounds of tobacco to be by the said John Wright ^& Mary his wife^ paid to the said Tobias Wells


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Chancery Court, Chancery Record, 1671-1712
Volume 748, Page 57   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives