Volume 740, Page 52 View pdf image |
And Whereupon the Said Plaintiff in his afd Capacity by Richd Macklin his Attry Complains that Whereas the Said Dennis Cantin in his life time to wit on the first day of March Anno Domi 1696 in Kent Coty At Chester river^ within the Jurisdiction of this Court by his certn. bill Obligatory Sealed with the seale of the Said Dennis Cantin And As his Act and deed delivered and here into Court brought Whose date is the afd day and year did bind himself his heires Executrs. and Admrs to pay unto the Said Benjamin Dollen his heires Exrs Admrs. or Assignes the afd Sume of 693lb tobo~ Qualifyed as afd at or upon the tenth day of Octobr then next Ensuing the date of the Said bill obligatory to be paid Convenient in Chester river Yet Notwithstanding the Said Denis Cantin in his life time nor the Said Susannah when Sole nor the Said Thomas Tagg and Susannah his wife after their Intermarriage the afd Sume of 693lb tobacco unto the Said Benja: Dollin according to the tenr. of the Said bill obligatory in the life time of the Said Benja. Did not pay Nor to the Sd Plaintfs after the death of the Said Benjamin the Said Sume of 693lb Tobo. have not as yet payd but the Same to pay the Sd. Thomas and Susannah have and as yet do deny and unjustly detaine to the damage of the Said Benjamin Dollens Estate in the hands of the Said plaintf. 786lb. tobo. and thereupon he brings this Suit, And into Court his letters of Admrcon where =by It Appears &ca. Macklin pr qr. pledges &ca. Jno. Doe R: Roe == And A Coppy of the sd decln having been Served wth. the writ According to Act of Assembly in order for An Immediate Tryall, The Cause was Contd. untill next Court by Consent At Which Said Next Court to wit the 24th. day of March All proceedings being by virtue of An Act of Assembly in that Case prticularly Made ^is the first tuesday of Aprill This cause was Contd. Accordingly. ~ Att Which Said first Tuesday of Aprill to wit this Seventh of the Same Month 1702 / Comes the Sd Defendants by Mich Earle their Attory who defends the force And Injury when &ca And for plea Sayth that No process Issue nor other ^things be done against the Said Defs. for that the Admrs. Sayth that they have Regularly paid diverse Sums of tobacco Amounting unto the Sume of Seven thousand one hundred forty one pounds Which tantamounts the intestates estate as appeares by An ( Account |
||||
Volume 740, Page 52 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.