clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Kent County Court, Proceedings, 1701-1705
Volume 740, Page 478   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
      And ye Said Deft apprd bÿ Michael Earle his attrÿ and praÿed leave leave to Imprle untill next
      Court wch was Granted him ye Same Daÿ was Given ye pltf allsoe att wch Sd next Court
      being this 27th Daÿ of March anno Dñi 1705 when comes ye Sd partÿes and ye Sd Deft
      bÿ attry. afsd Comes and Defends ye force &ca and Saÿeth as falloweth (in answer to ye Declan
      afsd
The Exrs of Pondr. | And ye Said Deft bÿ Michael Earle his attrÿ comes & Defends ye force & Injurÿ &ca
        at | and Saith for ye manifold uncertaintÿes and Insufficienceyes in ye pltfs Declon
  Richard Jagoe | and ye matter therein Contained he ye Sd Deft is not bound nor bÿ ye Law of

| the Land is his oblieged to answer thereunto all which he ye Sd Deft is readÿ to
reasons in Demr.   aver therefore for want of a good Declon of him ye Said pltfs & Sufficient —

  mattr. therein Contained he ye Sd Deft prays Judgt &ca
  first rason -   The pltf in ye titular part of his Declon Saith yt Richard Jagoe otherwise Called

  Richard Jagoe of Kent Countÿ in ye Province of Marÿland Planters are

  attached to answer &ca is Incoherent and prposterous, and noe prpr nor formall method of Declarence
Second reason   The pltf alledgeth yt ye Sd Deft was attached to answer &ca whereas ye rule of

  Declareing in all actions under hand & Seale into alledge and Sett forth yt ye Deft or

  Defts was Sumoned to answr. unto the pltf or pltfs of a plea yt She he or theÿ rendr. &ca
third reason   The pltf in Sd Declan Setts forth yt ye Sd Deft bÿ his Certaine writeing undr. and his hand and

  Seale and here in Court brought had Granted himselfe to paÿ &ca but not alledge yt ye

  Same writeing was obligatorÿ or yt is was Sealed wth his Seale & as his act and Deed

  Delivered &ca ye want of which makes it of noe force nor vertue yt being the

  Essentiall act yt Gives Life and vigor to all Instrumts undr. hand and Seale The

  omission of which rendrs. ye Declan as lame and Imprfect as ye want of Sealeing ye

  Delivering Doth ye obligation:——
fourth reason                 The pltf in Sd Declon Stiles herselfe widdow & relict & ExEx in ye Inductive part of

her Declan but afterwards comes on and Saith yt in her afsd Capacitie She Complaines

&ca but which of ye three ye Deft knoweth not, nor upon which She wo’ld have ye

Claimed Judgt to Defend or whether She would have Judgt for Everÿ of ye three

Capcitÿes which is an unreasonable method of Declareing &ca
  ffifth reason The pltf in ye Conclusive pt of her Declan Saith She ye worse is & Damãge hath to-

ye vallue of 8000ls of tobo whereas ye Damãge onelÿ redoands to ye to ye Testators’ Estate

in her hands and Soe ought to have been alledged; an ExEx being onelÿ a trustÿ in ye Law &ca.

for which reasons ye Sd Deft praÿs Judgt   as afsd

                                                                            Earle pr Defte
      Which Declan plea and Def Demrur being bÿ ye Court heard and fullÿ understood wch
      manÿ other pleadings and allegations on both Sides It is bÿ ym Considered yt ye Said —
      pltf his Declon afsd Stands good, and yt he ye Sd have Judgt agt ye Sd Deft for &ca

        Therefore It is Considered herebÿ ye Justices this 27th Daÿ of March –
                                             in her afsd Capacitie
      anno Dñi 1705 yt ye Sd pltf, recovr agt ye Sd Deft as well ye Sume of four thousand
      pounds of tobo quallifÿed as afsd as ye Sume of
      pounds of tobacco Cost of Suit and ye Deft in mercÿ &ca
      And the Said Deft praÿs yt ye Sd Judgt maÿ be wth Staÿ of Execution untill
      after ye 10th Daÿ of 8ber next and Granted unto him &ca



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Kent County Court, Proceedings, 1701-1705
Volume 740, Page 478   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives