clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1979
Volume 737, Page 2250   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

2250                                                    VETOES

May 29, 1979

Honorable James Clark, Jr.
President of the Senate
State House
Annapolis, Maryland 21404

Dear Mr. President:

In accordance with Article II, Section 17 of the
Maryland Constitution, I have today vetoed Senate Bill 1036.

This bill authorizes the Board of Public Works to
adopt, subject to approval by the Joint Standing Committee
on Administrative, Executive and Legislative Review,
regulations by which State agencies may enter into capital
project related contracts and change orders prior to or
without the Board's approval under certain circumstances.
It is a significant piece of legislation for two reasons:
First, because it would enable the Board to relieve itself
of the unnecessary and increasing burden of relatively minor
contracts and change orders. Secondly, because it paves the
way for a judicial resolution of the constitutional
authority of the General Assembly to condition the exercise
of an administrative agency's rule making authority upon the
approval of a legislative committee, i.e., it subjects
administrative rule making to a so—called "legislative veto"
mechanism.

Senate Bill 1036 is substantially the same as Senate
Bill 296 of 1978, which my predecessor vetoed on both policy
and constitutional grounds.1/

I too have serious reservations regarding the wisdom of
such mechanisms. However, I also agree with the sponsor of
this measure that the significant question of the
constitutionality of legislative veto mechanisms should be
made available for resolution by the courts of Maryland.
Accordingly, I did not oppose this measure during its
passage through the General Assembly.

Nevertheless, in order to preserve my strong policy
objections to the use of such devices and to insure that the
courts are presented with a legislative veto question which
is not tainted by an apparent gubernatorial approval, 2/ I am
vetoing Senate Bill 1036.

Sincerely,
Harry Hughes
Governor

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1979
Volume 737, Page 2250   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives