clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1978
Volume 736, Page 1985   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

BLAIR LEE III, Acting Governor                            1985

(C)    IF, BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR HEARING, APPLICATION
IS MADE TO THE COURT FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT ADDITIONAL
EVIDENCE ON THE ISSUES IN THE CASE, AND IT IS SHOWN TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT THE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IS
MATERIAL AND THAT THERE WERE GOOD REASONS FOR FAILURE TO
PRESENT IT IN THE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE AGENCY, THE COURT
MAY ORDER THAT THE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE BE TAKEN IN OPEN
COURT OR BEFORE THE AGENCY UPON SUCH CONDITIONS AS THE COURT
DEEMS PROPER. IN CASES IN WHICH THE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IS
TAKEN BEFORE THE AGENCY, IT MAY MODIFY ITS FINDINGS AND
DECISION BY REASON OF THE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE AND SHALL FILE
WITH THE REVIEWING COURT, TO BECOME A PART OF THE RECORD,
THE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE, TOGETHER WITH ANY MODIFICATIONS OR
NEW FINDINGS OR DECISION.

(D)    THE REVIEW SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY THE COURT
WITHOUT A JURY. IN CASES OF ALLEGED IRREGULARITIES IN
PROCEDURE BEFORE THE AGENCY, NOT SHOWN IN THE RECORD,
TESTIMONY THEREON MAY BE TAKEN IN THE COURT. THE COURT
SHALL, UPON REQUEST, HEAR ORAL ARGUMENT AND RECEIVE WRITTEN
BRIEFS.

(E)    THE COURT MAY AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE AGENCY
OR REMAND THE CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; OR IT MAY
REVERSE OR MODIFY THE DECISION IF THE SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS OF
THE PETITIONERS MAY HAVE BEEN PREJUDICED BECAUSE THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS, INFERENCES, CONCLUSIONS, OR
DECISIONS ARE:

(1)    IN VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS;

OR

(2)    IN EXCESS OF THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY OR
JURISDICTION OF THE AGENCY; OR

(3)    MADE UPON UNLAWFUL PROCEDURE; OR
(4) AFFECTED BY OTHER ERROR OF LAW; OR

(5)    UNSUPPORTED BY COMPETENT, MATERIAL, AND
SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN VIEW OF THE ENTIRE RECORD AS
SUBMITTED; OR

(6)    AGAINST THE WEIGHT OF COMPETENT, MATERIAL
AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN VIEW OF THE ENTIRE RECORD, AS
SUBMITTED BY THE AGENCY AND INCLUDING DE NOVO EVIDENCE TAKEN
IN OPEN COURT; OR

(7)    UNSUPPORTED BY THE ENTIRE RECORD, AS
SUBMITTED BY THE AGENCY AND INCLUDING DE NOVO EVIDENCE TAKEN
IN OPEN COURT; OR

(8)    ARBITRARY OR CAPRICIOUS.
213.

AN AGGRIEVED PARTY MAY SECURE A REVIEW OF ANY FINAL
JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT UNDER THIS SUBTITLE BY APPEAL

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1978
Volume 736, Page 1985   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives