|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ch. 14
|
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAWS OF MARYLAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"reliable" is added to modify "information" to
conform to the similar reference made in
relation to information received of the theft.
Finally, in paragraph (2) of the subsection,
the reference to the "Maryland State Police"
is substituted for "local sheriff's office or
police department"; since the theft itself was
reported to the State Police, it seems logical
to require that the recovery similarly be
reported to the State Police and, therefore,
it becomes unnecessary to report it locally,
since the State Police regularly do so in
actual practice.
In subsection (b) of this section, reference
is added to a vehicle "titled" in this State,
to cover those vehicles—-such as farm
equipment--that may be titled but are not
subject to registration.
In subsections (c) and (d) of this section,
the terms "embezzled" and "embezzlement" are
substituted for "converted" and "conversion",
respectively. Although Uniform Vehicle Code
§§4—105 and 4-106 refer throughout to a
"conversion", the Maryland General Assembly
adopted the word "embezzlement" in present
Art. 66 1/2, §§4-105(b) and 4-106, but -
apparently by inadvertence — failed to conform
present §4—105 (c) and (d), as well. But,
see, note below.
In subsection (c) of this section, the present
provisions that permit the Administration to
prepare "weekly lists" of vehicles reported
stolen or embezzled are deleted as
unnecessary.
The only other changes are in style.
14-105.1. SECURED PARTY TO NOTIFY POLICE OF
REPOSSESSION.
EVERY SECURED PARTY WHO TAKES POSSESSION OF A
VEHICLE IN WHICH HE HAS A SECURITY INTEREST SHALL;
(1) IMMEDIATELY INFORM THE POLICE THAT HE HAS DONE
SO; AND
(2) GIVE ANY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ABOUT THE
VEHICLE THAT THE POLICE REASONABLY REQUEST.
REVISOR'S NOTE: This section presently appears as
Art. 66 1/2, §4-105.1.
The only changes are in style.
As to repossessions generally, see CL §9-503.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
