580

LAWS OF MARYLAND

[Ch. 49

(4) IF THERE WERE ANY PRIOR PLATES OF THE
SAME MASTER IMAGE:

(i) THE TOTAL SOMBER OF PLATES; AND

(ii) A DESIGNATION OF THE PLATE FROM WHICH
THE PRINT WAS TAKEN;

(5) IF THERE WERE ANY PRIOR OR LATER EDITIONS
FROM THE SAME PLATE:

(i) THE SERIES NUMBER OF THE EDITION OF WHICH
THE PRINT IS A PART; AND

EDITIONS;

(ii) THE AGGREGATE SIZE OF ALL OTHER

(6)    WHETHER THE EDITION IS A POSTHUMOUS
EDITION OR RESTRIKE AND, IF IT IS, WHETHER THE PLATE HAS
BEEN REWORKED; AND

(7)    THE NAME OF ANY WORKSHOP WHERE THE
EDITION WAS PRINTED.

(B) DISCLAIMER OF KNOWLEDGE.

IF THE PERSON LACKS KNOWLEDGE AS TO A BY INFORMATION
REQUIRED TO BE DISCLOSED BY THIS SECTION, HE SHALL
DISCLAIM THAT KNOWLEDGE SPECIFICALLY WITH REGARD TO EACH
OF THESE ITEMS OF INFORMATION SO THAT THE PURCHASER IS
ABLE TO JUDGE THE DEGREE OF UNIQUENESS OR SCARCITY OF
EACH PRINT.

REVISOR'S NOTE: Subsection (a) of this section
presently appears as Art. 83, §181, The
phrase "exclusive of trial proofs," which
presently appears in the source law for the
introductory language of subsection (a)(2), is
transferred to paragraph (2) (iii) of this
subsection for purposes of clarity.
Subsection (a)(5) is reworded for clarity;
neither §181 (d), which refers to "prior plates
of the same impression," nor the California
counterpart to this section, which refers to
"prior states of the same impression," are
truly meaningful since the existence of a
different plate, by definition, precludes the
possibility of the "same" impression or fine
print. This revision, therefore, adopts the
term "master image"; as that term is used in
§14-501(b), it includes not only the image for
a particular fine print but, also, the image
which is the model for one or more fine
prints. The Commission feels that this change