clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1975
Volume 716, Page 4045   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

MARVIN MANDEL, Governor

4045

made to the corporate income tax, and the collateral
inheritance tax was increased from 7-1/2% to 10%.

On April 11, 1975 - four days after the General
Assembly adjourned — I received a copy of a press release
issued by you after consultation with the House
leadership, calling attention to the inequities of the
two cent increase in the cigarette tax, and requesting
that I veto the bill. This request, and the grounds for
it were repeated at a meeting with the House and Senate
leaders held a few days later.

The concerns which you, and other members of the
General Assembly, expressed are, in my judgment, valid.
I agree with you that an increase of only two cents in
the cigarette tax as a method of funding the increased
State aid for police protection, is most unwise.

Although there is some dispute as to the exact
amount, it is clear that a significant percentage of all
the cigarettes sold in Maryland are dispensed through
vending machines. It is probable that, given the
practical difficulties in refunding pennies, the price of
cigarettes sold through machines will increase by a
nickel a pack, the unlikely alternative being for the
cigarette marketers to absorb the two cent tax. If, as
expected, the price on these sales is increased five
cents a pack, the tobacco dealers and distributors will
reap a windfall of nearly three cents a pack, with the
consumer bearing the full five cent burden at a time when
he can ill afford it. Whether similar increases will be
effected for over-the—counter and carton sales is
conjectural, but certainly possible. Mr. Lawrence D.
Shubnell, Director of the Division of Budget Review,
Department of Fiscal Services has estimated that the
dealers and distributors would gain a windfall profit of
$7,380,000 from the bill.

These considerations caused me to announce that I
would veto House Bill 1170 and call the General Assembly
into Special Session to reconsider the method of funding
this needed appropriation. To its credit, the General
Assembly, in Special Session, swiftly enacted Senate Bill
2, which re—enacted the appropriation and funded it on a
more equitable basis.

Because the enactment of Senate Bill 2, which I have
signed into law today, has made it unnecessary for me to
sign House Bill 1170, I have vetoed it.

Sincerely,

/s/ Marvin Mandel

Governor

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1975
Volume 716, Page 4045   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives