clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws and Journals, 1969, January Special Session
Volume 693, Page 91   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

1969]                   OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES                        17

We are in agreement with Mr. Richard Ackroyd, Public Roads Division Engineer in Maryland, that the requirements in subparagraph 270(r) that a certificate of registration must be issued to a prospective architect or engineer bidder before his bid is considered, are contrary to the Federal Aid Regulations of this Administraton. Specifically, the second sentence of section 1.16 of the Federal Aid Regulations reads as follows:

No contractor shall be required by law, regulation or practice to obtain a license before he may submit a bid or before his bid may be considered for award of a contract.

We would have no legal objection to the bill, however, if a proviso were added to subparagraph 270(r) to make it inapplicable to Federal-aid projects or if provision were made for an exemption of Federal-aid projects under subparagraph 270(t).

Please let us know if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely yours.

/s/ Howard A. Heffron, Chief Counsel.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Bureau of Public Roads

Region Two

Baltimore, Md., March 29, 1968.

Mr. Jerome B. Wolff

Chairman-Director

Maryland State Roads Commission

300 W. Preston Street

Baltimore, Maryland 21201

Dear Mr. Wolff:

We have just had occasion to review House Bill No. 714 that we understand has been recently passed by the Maryland Legislature. Your attention is called to the fact that the new matter added to the act under subparagraph 270 (r) on page 4, appears to be contrary to the provisions of Section 1.16 of Volume 4 of Federal regulations related to highways.

The regulations state that "No contractor shall be required by law, regulation or practice to obtain a license before he may submit a bid or before his bid can be considered for an award of contract." This appears to us to be directly contrary to the provisions of the house bill and in our opinion would preclude our approval of any Federal-aid highway projects in Maryland.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Richard Ackroyd, Division Engineer.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws and Journals, 1969, January Special Session
Volume 693, Page 91   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives