650                               LAWS OF MARYLAND                        [CH. 298

collection jurisdiction for the purpose of collecting moneys unlaw-
fully withheld from employees by out-of-State employers.

Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That this Act shall take effect
June 1, 1967.

Approved April 14, 1967.

CHAPTER 298
(House Bill 823)

AN ACT to repeal and re-enact, with amendments, Section 67 of
Article 2B of the Annotated Code of Maryland (1957 Edition),
title "Alcoholic Beverages," subtitle "Procedure for Issue of
Licenses," to provide that the limitations placed upon further

application after a refusal to issue a liquor license shall not apply

to applicants where the refusal was based on the grounds it was
not necessary for the accommodation of the public, because the
promises were not suitable to the sale of alcoholic beverages, or
because the applicant was determined not to be a proper person
IN CHARLES COUNTY FOR CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE
LIMITATIONS AGAINST FURTHER APPLICATIONS FOR
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES IN THE COUNTY
AFTER A LICENSE APPLICATION HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN
REFUSED.

Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Maryland,
That Section 67 of Article 2B of the Annotated Code of Maryland
(1957 Edition), title "Alcoholic Beverages," subtitle "Procedure for
Issue of Licenses," be and it is hereby repealed and re-enacted, with
amendments, to read as follows:

67.

If a license is refused, except as herein provided, no further appli-
cation shall be considered from the applicant or for the premises, as
the case may be, for a period of six months, and if a subsequent
application by the same applicant or for the same premises is refused
within the two-year period immediately following the date of the
first refusal, then no further application shall be considered from
such applicant or for such premises, as the case may be, until the
two-year period above provided for has elapsed [, provided, however,
this section shall not hold against an applicant where a license was
refused on the grounds it was not necessary for the accommodation
of the public or because the premises were not suitable to the sale
of alcoholic beverages under the license applied for; neither shall
such restriction hold against such premises set forth in an applica-
tion when the license applied for was refused because the applicant
personally was determined not to be a proper person to be issued the
license applied for]. IN CHARLES COUNTY, THE LIMITATIONS
OF THIS SECTION ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THE REFUSAL
OF A LICENSE ON THE GROUNDS THE LICENSE WAS NOT
NECESSARY FOR THE ACCOMMODATION OF THE PUBLIC,