clear space clear space clear space white space
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1963
Volume 671, Page 2188   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
clear space clear space clear space white space

2188                                      VETOES

May 1, 1963.

Honorable William S. James
President of the Senate
State House
Annapolis, Maryland

Dear Mr. President:

In accordance with the provisions of Article 2, Section 17, of the
Maryland Constitution, I have today vetoed Senate Bill 320, and am
returning this Bill to you accompanied by my veto message.

The Bill would require the State Auditor to compile information
regarding motor vehicles purchased by the State for use by the vari-
ous departments, agencies and boards. This information would in-
clude the propriety and necessity for use, the possible excessive use
and the cost of operation. The Auditor would make his findings
available to the Governor and General Assembly along with recom-
mendations for controlling and curtailing the acquisition and use
of such motor vehicles.

I can appreciate the desire on the part of members of the General
Assembly to eliminate any unnecessary use of motor vehicles by
State officials and employees. Certainly, every effort should be made
to eliminate unnecessary cost wherever possible.

However, the State Auditor has advised me that the provisions
of the Bill would add materially to the work load of his office. He
further advises that if such an increase in the work load is not ac-
companied by provisions for an increase in his staff, the result will
be a slowing down or reversal of the progress that is being made to
place the work of this office on a current basis.

The Bill would also require the State Auditor to enter into three
areas in which it has not functioned in the past:

1—The compilations of "cost of operation" statistics will require
the accumulation of extensive data whereas, the function of the
State Auditor's office in the past has been one of auditing the
records of the other agencies of the State.

2—The determination of "the propriety and necessity for use"
is an administrative function rather than one of fact finding and
reporting to which the State Auditor's office has been restricted
in the past.

3—The determination of "possible excessive use" would require
the State Auditor's office to assume an investigative function in
addition to examining financial records.

It should be pointed out that the Chief Deputy Comptroller is in
agreement with the State Auditor regarding this Bill. It is his belief
that the State Auditor should not be placed in the position of having
to make expert findings in fields in which neither he nor his staff are
qualified as experts.

The State Auditor is in the process of compiling a report regard-
ing the number and use of State motor vehicles based on data fur-
nished by the Vice-Chairman of the House Ways and Means Com-
mittee. This report will include certain recommendations regarding
the various areas that should be considered in effecting satisfactory
control over the cost and use of State automobiles.


clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1963
Volume 671, Page 2188   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  

This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives