2184 VETOES
Furthermore, Subsection H, Section 150, of Article 66˝, which
pertains to the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund, defines an
uninsured motor vehicle as one on which there is not in force a liabil-
ity insurance policy meeting the requirements of Section 122. This
would require all motor vehicle owners to carry liability insurance
bearing limits of $15,000 for any one person and $30,000 for each
accident. However, Section 162 and 172, also pertaining to the Un-
satisfied Claim and Judgment Fund, provide that the maximum
amounts payable from the Fund should be $10,000 and $20,000 re-
spectively.
While I have no specific objections to revising existing limits, I do
feel that, if such action is taken, other sections of the existing law
should be amended accordingly. For this reason, I am returning
Senate Bill 100.
With kindest personal regards, I am
Sincerely yours,
(s) J. MILLARD TAWES,
Governor.
JMT/Jd/Encl.
Senate Bill No. 120—Funds of Board of Medical Examiners
AN ACT to add a new Section 129B to Article 43 of the Annotated
Code of Maryland (1957 Edition and 1962 Supplement), title
"Health," subtitle "Practitioners of Medicine," to follow immediately
after Section 129A thereof, providing that certain surplus funds in
the custody of the Board of Medical Examiners shall revert to the
General Funds of the State.
May 2, 1963.
Honorable William S. James
President of the Senate
State House
Annapolis, Maryland
Dear Mr. President:
In accordance with the provisions of Article 2, Section 17 of the
Maryland Constitution, I have today vetoed Senate Bill No. 120 and
am returning this Bill along with my veto message.
This Bill provides that certain surplus funds in the custody of the
Board of Medical Examiners shall revert to the general funds of the
State.
The Attorney General of Maryland finds that the title, enacting
clause and body of the Act are completely different from the form
in which the Bill was originally introduced. That is to say, the
amendment ultimately effected by the General Assembly is on a
matter entirely foreign to the Bill as it was originally introduced.
I have been further advised that this Bill would virtually cripple
the operation of the Board of Medical Examiners from a fiscal
standpoint.
|