1858.] OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES.          569

Which was determined in the affirmative.

The said bill being upon its second reading,

Mr. Mackubin proposed the following amendment:

" Strike out the 4th section;"

Mr. Belt proposed the following substitute for said amend-
ment:

Strike out the "enacting clause ;"

The yeas and nays being demanded upon the substitute
offered by Mr. Belt, appeared as follow

	Affirmative.
Messrs. Morgan,	Goldsborough,	Gray,
Neale,	Belt,	Schnebley,
Wickes,	Landing,	Riddlemoser,
Burgess,	Koons,	Duvall,
Stonestreet,	Rogers,	Worthington,
Allender,	Lynch, of B. city,	Barnard—-20.
Ford, of Balt. co.	Summers,
	Negative.
Messrs. Berry, Sp'r,	Richardson,	Baker,
Meginnis,	Davis,	Stirling,
Tongue,	Ford, of Cecil,	McPherson,
Mackubin,	Wyville,	Smith, of B. city,
Griffiss,	Sudler, of Q. A.	Kennard,
Magruder, Walker,	Spence,	Harrington,
Hearn,	Crowley,
Waller,	Thomas,	Rohrer,
Moore,	Bowlus,	McKinstry,
Sudler, of Som.	Root,	Reindollar,
Tilghman, Dail,	Hobbs,	Welling,
Bacon,	Dorsey—36.

So the House did not assent to the substitute.
The question then recurring on the amendment;
It was assented to.
Mr. Rogers proposed the following amendments :

"In line 4, section 2, insert the word "be proven," and
strike out the word "can prove;" line 5, section 2, strike out,
the words "that they did not open," and insert " to have
opened;"

Which amendments were not assented to.
Mr. Rogers proposed the following amendment:
Section 1, strike out all after the word "Baltimore" in the
10th line.