clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Documents of the House, 1858
Volume 665, Page 1569   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

11

To the 9th interrogatory, he answers that under the law of
1803, it was as much a monopoly as it is now; if you did not
speak a vessel outside you made nothing, that law compelled
pilots to speak vessels outside of the Capes before they received
half pilotage.

To the 10th interrogatory, he answers and says, the receipts
prior to 1852, did not go into a common fund.

Henry Guyther.

W. Mankin, sworn.—To the 1st, 2nd, 3d, 4th, he has no
knowledge.

To the 5th he says, the compensation made to Pilots under the
law of 1853 during the last 14 months is greater in proportion
than that received by any other class of persons connected with
commerce, and that the facilities to commerce if any, arising from
increased compulsory compensation would more than be counter-
balanced by the disadvantages.

To the 6th he says the best interests of commerce foreign

and domestic would be subserved by open competition under such

rules and regulations as might be adopted by a Board of Trade.

To the 7th he says, in his judgment the effect would be

injurious.

To 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, he has no
knowledge.

To the 16th, he says, he has not been engaged in commerce
for the last 3 years, that he is convinced from observation that
removal of half pilotage is advantageous to the commerce of
Baltimore.

To the 17th he says, in his judgment the number of Pilots
may be decreased as there are more Pilots than are required by
the present commerce of Baltimore.

To the 18th he says, he is not interested in any ship or
vessel, his occupation has been that of a shipping merchant up
to last 3 years.

To the 19th he has no knowledge.

To the 20th he says that his knowledge of the receipts of the
Pilots is derived from the evidence mentioned to this committee
in his presence.

To the 21st he says, I was in favor of a change of the laws
of 1852 into a system of Pilot laws void of compulsion or free to
all competent persons but agreed to the laws of 1853 as a com-
promise.

To the 22nd he says I believe that an efficient number of
Pilots is absolutely necessary to the commerce of Baltimore and
that a free competition would produce them.

To the 23d he says the number of Pilots required in my
opinion for the present commerce of Baltimore is less than fifty.
In the last 12 months I estimate the number of vessels using
Pilots which passed up and down the bay to be about 400. I
estimate the average passage both ways to be 8 days, though I

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Documents of the House, 1858
Volume 665, Page 1569   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives