clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Kent County Court Proceedings, 1676-1698
Volume 557, Page 605   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
                                                                                                                    605

Answer
The Courts Opinion upon M.r Hemsley his Motion last Court that all
writts might be Warranted by an Attorney may be pregnant Enough
to Answer the 6.th reason


7.th reas
The Writt is Notoriously ^bad^ by reason it is signed by Simon Wilmer who
is both Clerk and plain.ts &c.a but the Clerk for his Fees must have his
writt signed by the Cheif Justice of the Court &c.a


Answer
I conceive upon an Execucon the cheif Justice ought to signe the
writt for such Officers Fees but this is a scire fa to sum illegible the party
before the Justices who are in such case Judges and therin he mistakes his
maxim in Law for Simon Wilmer is Neither Agent nor patient the
sheerif of the County being therin Agent & the party same Patient
and the Justices before whome the Matter is brought and to heare and determine
and in all this Simon Wilmer but in his private Capacity as plt
The Law hath made provition in all Accons brought either for or
ag.t the sheerif must be either Agent or Patient but no person Authorised
to Issue out Writts but the Clerk of the County who neither cann Imprison
nor determine by all which it appeares the reason above to be of no validity
but wrested to a Wrong sence and in this case not applicable


8.th reaso The Writt is bad in the returne being directed to the sheerif &c.a
It hath been the Continued practice of this Court to suffer under sheerifs
being sworne such to make returne of all manner of processe
Therfore by the practice of this Court the Writt is fully persued in
that part


9.th reaso
The writt is faulty because the Wife is not Named in the Writt as
well as the husband &c.a


Answer
That where the Wife contracts any debt the husband that shall be answerable
and moreover the said William North att the time of his Wifes Tryal
made himselfe Answerable by vindicateing his said Wife in her offence
notwithstanding she was found guilty by the verdict of Twelve men to the
scandle of Christian Religion and against the good Lawes of this Province
in such case made and provided And if such persons and if such p.rsons
shall be Exempt from punishment both in body and parse there will be little
regard made of either Law or Religion


10.th reas
The Sheerif &c.a


Answer
That this last reason with all the rest are Sophistical and contrary to
the practice of this Court and therfore prayes he may have Judgment
for Execucon according to the Tenor of his scire facias
                                                                                                Simon Wilmer Plt


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Kent County Court Proceedings, 1676-1698
Volume 557, Page 605   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives