clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Journal of the House of Delegates, 1808
Volume 556, Page 73   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS, NOVEMBER SESSION, 1808. 73

act for the valuation of real and personal property within this state, the bill to prevent the erection of huck-
ster's booths near the places and during the times of divine worship, the further supplement to an act, entitled.
An act for regulating the mode of staying executions, and repealing the acts of assembly therein mentioned, and
the bill to repeal so much of the act, entitled, An act for erecting a village at Choptank bridge, in Caroline
county, and for other purposes, and the several supplements thereto, as prohibits the running at large of geese
and swine in said village, severally endorsed, " will not pass. " Also the bill to lay out and open a road in Caro-
line county from or near Cain Ross's plantation to intersect the state line at or near Brown's chapel, endorsed,
" will pass with the proposed amendments; " which amendments were read, agreed to, and the bill ordered to
be engrossed. The bill to make public the road therein mentioned, endorsed, " will pass with the proposed a-
mendments; " which amendments were read. Also the resolutions in favour of William Dawson, Ariana
French, Robert Halkerstone, William Keough, John Trueman, John Lynch, Denwood Hicks, Gassaway Wat-
kins and David Hopkins, severally endorsed, "dissented from. " Also the resolution in favour of John C. Bond,
endorsed, " assented to. " And the resolution in favour of John Wilkins, endorsed, "will pass with the pro-
posed amendment; " which amendment was read and agreed to.
Mr. Tilghman appears in the house.

The following message was read.

By the HOUSE of DELEGATES, December 21, 1808.
Gentlemen of the Senate,

NOTHING but a strong sense of public duty could induce us at this late period of the session to solicit your
attention once more to the bill herewith sent, entitled, An act to regulate the fees of the register of the court
of chancery, but having passed this house on the 16th by a very considerable majority, and being returned the
day before yesterday with the negative of the senate simply endorsed upon it, we cannot relinquish the hope
that, upon a reconsideration of the bill, the reasonableness and expediency of its provisions must be apparent
to the wisdom and justice of your honourable body.

It can be scarcely necessary to premise what was the original motive of the legislature in establishing the fees
of the register m chancery, and of the clerks of the old court of appeals and the late general court, according
to the rates at which they stand in the fee bill of 1779. so much greater than those allowed to the clerks of the
county courts for the performance of similar services; it is sufficient to know that this difference did not arise
from any proportionate difference in the skill and labour required for the respective offices; and that with regard
to the court of appeals under its new organization, the legislature, by the act of 1805, have deemed it just and
proper to correct this inequality by enacting that thereafter " the clerks of the court of appeals for the western
and eastern shore respectively shall have the same fees for their services as the clerks of the county courts were
entitled to for the same and similar services by law, " and yet the fees of the register in chancery have been suf-
fered, to remain as they were, and thus this officer is permitted to receive charges of a much higher compensation
than are allowed to the officer in a court of the first dignity and the highest appellate jurisdiction in the state,
or than are allowed to the clerks of the county courts, where the services are similar, or precisely the same.
We submit to the senate a brief comparative statement of some of the principal items, which will not fail to at-
tract their notice, as it exhibits a singular and striking contrast.
 

FEES.

 

To the clerks of the county courts.

 

To the register in chancery.

 

lbs. Tobacco.

lbs. Tobacco.

for filing every bill,

2

20

every answer,

2

17

every plea,

2

4

every demurrer,

2

4

accounts, books of entries, &c.

2

4

every return of commission,

2

4

every petition and order thereon,

2

4

copying any matter and not enumerated

4

8

For every continuance,

2

20

The fee last specified, for the continuance of causes in the chancery court, being ten times the value of what
is allowed in the other courts, and being manifestly exorbitant in its nature, ought not to escape a particular
consideration. For every continuance of a cause the register now receives 20 lbs. of tobacco, or the sum of
2/6, so that for every cause which continues on the docket one year, (and we apprehend there are very few in-
deed which continue less, ) there being four terms in the year, the register is entitled of course to the sum of.
ten shillings for his service, which service is generally a mere fictitious one, and cannot consist in any thing
more than in entering the park of continuance in the four quarterly columns as they re extended through a
single docket, which he annually makes out for his own use, and thus, it being ascertained that there are at this
moment at least twelve hundred cases depending in chancery, it results, from a very obvious and simple calcula-
tion, that the register derives no less than the enormous amount of six hundred pounds a year from the mere art-

K.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Journal of the House of Delegates, 1808
Volume 556, Page 73   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 10, 2023
Maryland State Archives