clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1990 Session
Volume 436, Page 2363   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor Ch. 538

(c) Informal disposition may also be made of any contested case by stipulation,
agreed settlement, consent order, or default.

(d) Each agency shall adopt appropriate rules of procedure for notice and
hearing in contested cases.]

[245.

In contested cases:

(a) Agencies may admit and give probative effect to evidence which possesses
probative value commonly accepted by reasonable and prudent men in the conduct of
their affairs. They shall give effect to the rules of privilege recognized by law. They may
exclude incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial and unduly repetitious evidence.

(b) All evidence, including records and documents in the possession of the
agency, of which it desires to avail itself, shall be offered and made a part of the record
in the case, and no other factual information or evidence shall be considered in the
determination of the case. Documentary evidence may be received in the form of copies
or excerpts, or by incorporation by reference.

(c) Every party shall have the right of cross-examination of the witnesses who
testify, and shall have the right to submit rebuttal evidence.

(d) Agencies may take notice of judicially cognizable facts and in addition may
take notice of general, technical, or scientific facts within their specialized knowledge.
Parties shall be notified either before or during hearing, or by reference in preliminary
reports or otherwise, of the material so noticed, and they shall be afforded an
opportunity to contest the facts so noticed. Agencies may utilize their experience,
technical competence and specialized knowledge in the evaluation of the evidence
presented to them.]

[246.

In a contested case, whenever a majority of the officials of the agency who are to
render the final decision have not heard the evidence, the decision, if adverse to a party
to the proceeding other than the agency itself, shall not be made until a proposal for
decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, has been served upon the
parties, and an opportunity has been afforded to each party adversely affected to file
exceptions and present argument to a majority of the officials who are to render the
decision, who shall personally consider the whole record or those portions as may be
cited by the parties.]

[247.

(a) Any party aggrieved by a final decision in a contested case, whether the
decision is affirmative or negative in form, is entitled to judicial review thereof under
this subtitle.

(b) Proceedings for review shall be instituted in the Circuit Court of Washington
County. The court, in its discretion, may permit other interested persons to intervene.

- 2363 -


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1990 Session
Volume 436, Page 2363   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives