|
91
|
1
|
the various alternatives; so that an ultimate Consti-
|
2
|
tution Commission would deal with the problem.
|
3
|
We are going to turn here to question 5. It
|
4
|
seems to me that there are other alternatives in that
|
5
|
also, that is, whether to include a provision establish-
|
6
|
ing general legislation in terms of city sizes and county
|
7
|
sizes, on the one hand, or whether to leave this problem
|
8
|
for the Legislature. That does not exhaust the possi-
|
9
|
bilities at all.
|
10
|
There could be, with respect to the second one,
|
11
|
some guidance for the Legislature. My own philosophy
|
12
|
really runs along the idea of a broad Constitution which
|
13
|
permits a very good deal of flexibility, but has in it a
|
14
|
minimum of inflexibility. So, if someone says, a new
|
15
|
development turned up in the space age, let us work that
|
16
|
out within the institutions of the State, would be my
|
17
|
philosophy, rather than saying we must amend the Con-
|
18
|
stitution because we didn't think of that. That is why
|
19
|
I think a broad Constitution would be appropriate, with-
|
20
|
out getting to relative inflexibility.
|
21
|
You see, question 5 presents some inflexibility
|