|
1
|
as one point.
|
|
2
|
MR. ENEY: Joe, I'm not quite sure I follow
|
|
3
|
you and I think that is an important point. You mean by
|
|
4
|
retaining the Senate, you get a different kind of repre-
|
|
5
|
sentation that would give a little more say-so to the
|
|
6
|
less populous counties? Is that what you're hitting at?
|
|
7
|
SENATOR CURRAN: This is one way of doing it.
|
|
8
|
I would hate to think that we would do away with area
|
|
9
|
representation and strictly go on the populous areas.
|
|
10
|
I think the retention of the Senate would in some way
|
|
11
|
insure, to a degree, to the areas that are not perhaps
|
|
12
|
as rapidly growing at least some semblance of a say in
|
|
13
|
the one thing that most concerns them and that is the
|
|
14
|
distribution of revenues.
|
|
15
|
MR. ENEY: In other words, if I follow you,
|
|
16
|
what you are saying is you would prefer to retain the
|
|
17
|
Senate because of the same reason you have it now, but
|
|
18
|
in a lesser degree?
|
|
19
|
SENATOR CURRAN: Well, it's another shot at
|
|
20
|
the problem. That may not be the only reason, but that
|
|
21
|
is ray one reason the idea of home rule is not good,
|
