|
20
|
1
|
the two houses. We do have the two houses. 1 prefer it,
|
2
|
frankly, because I think, regardless of the comments, I
|
3
|
think it serves a very valuable purpose when you have two
|
4
|
bodies; but I think you ought to look into the size of
|
5
|
those two bodies, as to what would be a practical size
|
6
|
for the House as well as the Senate.
|
7
|
I think that 142 members in the House which we
|
8
|
have now may be a little too large. I think it may make
|
9
|
it a little unwieldy. It formerly was 123, and that was
|
10
|
large enough, by any means, and when it went --
|
11
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Suppose, Mr. Mandel, now that
|
12
|
you've gotten us to Question 9 -- before you came in
|
13
|
we said that by no means do we feel this is a ladder,
|
14
|
we're going to seek to cover all of these and not
|
15
|
necessarily give all our comments today. There will be
|
16
|
another opportunity at another time, and you might send
|
17
|
us your comments at any time you choose, too; but since
|
18
|
you moved us into Question 9 --
|
19
|
DELEGATE MANDEL: I think the two of them
|
20
|
have to be considered together.
|
21
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Go ahead and comment on this
|