|
1
|
let's not put it in.
|
|
2
|
MR. SYKES: I don't say it can't be done.
|
|
3
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I was waiting for you to con-
|
|
4
|
test that. You are a lawyer.
|
|
5
|
MR. SYKES: I'm not saying it can't be done
|
|
6
|
or, in fact, that it should be tried. I'm saying to you
|
|
7
|
the best way to find out whether it can be done is to
|
|
8
|
try it. I wouldn't confess that it is impossible in
|
|
9
|
advance. I just don't know and I think that maybe you
|
|
10
|
can let some of the non-lawyers and the lawyers spend
|
|
11
|
time until they have convinced themselves, a, that it
|
|
12
|
can be done, it's worthwhile or, b, that it isn't worth
|
|
13
|
the effort.
|
|
14
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Lawyers use the standard test,
|
|
15
|
is it legally enforceable.
|
|
16
|
MR. SYKES: No, you don't have to -
|
|
17
|
THE CHAIRMAN: This is not the proper standard
|
|
18
|
I am not restricting it to that. I am restricting it to
|
|
19
|
the question of how useful -- I am discussing the ques-
|
|
20
|
tion of what would be the effect of incorporating
|
|
21
|
specific provisions which are not legally enforceable,
|
