|
25
|
1
|
recommended scheme in your opinion?
|
2
|
MR. WINTERS: There are considerable varia-
|
3
|
tions among those. In Missouri they are equally divided
|
4
|
between lawyers and laymen, with a judge as chairman.
|
5
|
For the appellate court it is three and three. And for
|
6
|
the trial courts, two and two. In that Denver County
|
7
|
Court situation, there is a majority of laymen.
|
8
|
MRS. BOTHE: As far as the inclusion of a
|
9
|
judge, that seems to be quite a controversial question,
|
10
|
whether a judge would be an undue influence.
|
11
|
MR. WINTERS: Well, I heard that debated.
|
12
|
In my opinion, it is desirable to have at least one
|
15
|
judge in on that, to begin with. It is desirable to
|
14
|
have laymen, because if it is all lawyers or all lawyers
|
15
|
and judges, there may be a tendency to overemphasize the
|
16
|
technical qualifications of this person, to favor what
|
17
|
they call the lawyer's lawyer. And the laymen on the
|
18
|
commission will tend to provide a broader evaluation
|
19
|
of his qualifications. An all-laymen commission, I have
|
20
|
often thought might work out very well, because if they
|
21
|
were the right kind of people, they would not attempt
|