|
44
|
1
|
size of the legislature. You could reduce the number and
|
2
|
the size of committees. You can establish legislative
|
3
|
aids, as most of the states have done. There are a whole
|
4
|
lot of things you can do perfectly well, if you really
|
5
|
want to do them. You don't have to adopt unicameralism.
|
6
|
I don't know whether it helps or not, but it
|
7
|
certainly has seemed to, because of the Nebraska exper-
|
8
|
ience.
|
9
|
Now, I have an interesting question, I think
|
10
|
it's an interesting question with regard to this, for
|
11
|
which I don't know any answer. There is agreement that
|
12
|
this forum has worked well in Nebraska. The State may
|
13
|
be a larger area, but the population is relatively small
|
14
|
and I think probably about as homogeneous as you could
|
15
|
find in any state in the union. Now, would this work,
|
16
|
I don't know, in Pennsylvania, New York, Michigan, with a
|
17
|
greatly larger population of a highly heterogeneous sort?
|
18
|
I don't know. Actually, I would like to know.
|
19
|
I would like to see some experiments. Although
|
20
|
Senator Norris objected to the word, I would like to see
|
21
|
some experiments in other states, so that we could
|