|
30
|
1
|
in language not exactly duplicated in either of the bills
|
2
|
that came through either house, and there is no chance to
|
3
|
amend this afterwards.
|
4
|
So, then the legislators vote for the bill and
|
5
|
they say, I had to vote for it. It was either this or
|
6
|
nothing. This is not true, unicameralists say, with a
|
7
|
unicameral legislature. There the legislator is publicly
|
8
|
accountable for his vote and he has to defend it on, the
|
9
|
ground of its merits, not that he had to take it or leave
|
10
|
it, or so on, and if he votes consistently in line with a
|
11
|
lobbyist, this will soon become obvious.
|
12
|
MR. SCANLAN: I notice a. sentence here, "It is
|
13
|
not uncommon for a Nebraskan legislator to denounce a
|
14
|
lobbyist by name on the floor of the house. " We have had
|
15
|
that experience in Maryland. I don't think that is any
|
16
|
particular virtue of the legislators in a unicameral
|
17
|
system.
|
18
|
DR. WHEELER: I think there is an obvious argu-
|
19
|
ment behind this often made in the defense of unicameralism,
|
20
|
which is simply, this is a more simple structure and more
|
21
|
easy to keep your eye on things. For example, I suppose,
|