|
28
|
1
|
it is more representative, you have a more representative
|
2
|
system under unicameralism. There are some statistics
|
3
|
on Nebraska. I don't know for certain -- I think they
|
4
|
do, myself.
|
5
|
You get into the argument here basically as to
|
6
|
whether you have a more representative legislature if you
|
7
|
have more members or fewer members. This is the basic
|
8
|
question involved here and you can make arguments either
|
9
|
way on that. We have already calked a little bit about
|
10
|
the quality of the enactment of legislation, one of the
|
11
|
claims made for unicameralism. I won't go into that any
|
12
|
further.
|
13
|
Another claim that is made, and this one seems
|
14
|
to be fairly factual, is that with unicameralism you have
|
15
|
no legislator introducing bills just for the sake of
|
16
|
pleasing a constituent with the full expectation it will
|
17
|
never be considered or never considered in the other house.
|
18
|
So that with unicameralism, there is a marked decrease in
|
19
|
the number of bills and, of course, of the number that
|
20
|
are finally enacted, the proportion is higher that finally
|
21
|
became law.
|