84

1

covering the School Board and the Superintendent of

2

Schools, and we at least tentatively rejected the sug-

3

gestion on the Miscellaneous Provisions Committee on

4

the basis that things have been going so very well and,

5

as you say, have been over such a substantial period

6

and it was unnecessary and perhaps even dangerous to

7

change the course of events by changing or adding to

8

the Constitution on the subject, and I wonder what

9

your thoughts are on that?

10

DR. SENSENBAUGH: I noticed that -- this is

11

true, this was discussed and one who was entered in

12

your recommendations was the University of Maryland.

13

I wondered, though, why, being a member of the Board .

14

of Trustees of the State colleges, which is going to

15

be quite a sizable group, why this was not entered,

16

although you did indicate that there were so many

17

different colleges; but these colleges did not have

18

separate boards. Maybe it would be wrong to spell out

19

in the Constitution that there would be a single board

20

continually operating the State colleges in Maryland,

21

because.it might possibly be some day you pay want to