|
1
|
idea of school funds and take it out of the Constitu-
|
|
2
|
tion and leave it to the legislature.
|
|
3
|
MRS. BOTHE: We have not so suggested, Mr.
|
|
4
|
Case. We suggested that the way it is now written
|
|
5
|
under education --
|
|
6
|
MR. CASE: Didn't you suggest that that come
|
|
7
|
out entirely, the school fund?
|
|
8
|
MRS, BOTHE: Because of its being an anachro-
|
|
9
|
nism, and we deferred to your Committee because we
|
|
10
|
thought it was a finance rather than a philosophical
|
|
11
|
question, the retention of the sense of Section 52.
|
|
12
|
MR. CASE: 52 hasn't got anything to do with
|
|
13
|
what we're talking about.
|
|
14
|
MRS. BOTHE: Yes, it does, because we felt
|
|
15
|
that the appropriations for school use should be in-
|
|
16
|
violate, but that Section 3 of Article 8 didn't serve
|
|
17
|
that purpose. Section 52 of Article 3 does, as we
|
|
18
|
construe it, and we recommend that the intent be per-
|
|
19
|
petuated under the Finance Committee.
|
|
20
|
MR. CASE: Very well. Does anyone else have
|
|
21
|
anything to ask?
|
